Laserfiche WebLink
<br />150~' <br /> <br />Net economic benefit <br /> <br />.. <br />.. <br />~ <br />= <br />"C <br />... <br />= <br />.. <br />c <br />:S <br />'s <br /> <br />AlIeroatives <br /> <br />I-A. loB I.C l-D 1l.A. ll-B H.D 1ll.A. lll-B lll-D l\l-E lll-F IV-A. <br /> <br />+1. <br />. <br />.2. <br />-.. <br />... <br />-.. <br />-100 <br />-120 <br />-140 <br />-160 <br />-180 <br />-200 <br />-220 <br />-240 <br />-260 <br />-280 <br />.-300 <br />-320 <br />-340 <br />-380 <br />-380 <br />.... <br />..2. <br />-4CO <br />-460 <br />-t80 <br />-SOD <br />-520 <br /> <br />--. <br /> <br /> <br />Alternative I-A <br />Two Forks Reservoir <br /> <br />The Two Forks Reservoir was origin- <br />ally proposed to store transbasin <br />imporls from the Blue River system <br />through the Harold D. Roberts Tun- <br />nel, in addition to Soutb Plalte River <br />Basin flows. The reservoir operations <br />and monetary impacls analyzed in <br />this assessment assume only storage <br />of native South Platte River flows, <br /> <br />.- <br /> <br />I~TII <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Alternative I-e <br />Chatfield Reservoir <br /> <br />Chatfield Reservoir could not provide <br />conservation storage for municipal <br />water unless the flood control pur- <br />poses for which it is currently oper- <br />ated were foregone in whole or in <br />part. It would take an act of Congress <br />to change Chalfield's authorized pur- <br />poses. If the purposes were changed. <br />the United States' investment would <br />presumably become repayable in full <br />with interest under the provisions of <br />the Water Supply Act of 1958. <br /> <br />Alternative II-A <br /> <br />Grey Mountain Reservoir <br /> <br />for purposes of Ihis assessment. <br />Grey Mountain Reservoir was as- <br />sumed to store only presently un- <br />developed water not to re-regulate <br />already developed flows. <br /> <br />Alternative III-E <br />Trans-County <br /> <br />No information was available regard- <br />ing possible reuse of recharged water <br />in the Repuhlican River Basin; hence, <br />no water reuse benefits were cal- <br />culated in the analysis of this alter- <br />native. <br /> <br />15 <br />