Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. .,' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />()1428 <br /> <br />A more accurate cost savings analysis of the Montrose proposal shows it costs SI.6 <br />million ~ than management's proposal, <br /> <br />The proposal reduces by S3.6 million the annual charges that the Phoenix, AZ and <br />Loveland, CO offices presently charge the eRS? for maintenance of facilities, customer <br />service work, coordination of billing and scheduling, etc, No alternative method for <br />accomplishing the work or associated costs are identified in the proposal, <br /> <br />The W APA management proposal saves at least S1.6 mi\1ion more per year than the Montrose <br />employee proposal. In addition, better coordination with the USBR and improved customer <br />access are retained, <br /> <br />8 <br />