My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06433
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06433
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:22:45 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:37:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.300
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agency Reports - USGS
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/2000
Author
USGS
Title
Water Quality in the Upper Colorado River Basin - Colorado 1996-98
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Colorado Plateau and the igneou,~ <br />m~t;lmorphic geology uf the South- <br />(.'rn Rody .\ 1001ll1:llm. Agncul- <br />tural return I\em ~ abo ,:ontrihu(c 10 <br />lhl.' greater ...edimenl ('t'nCl'nlration, <br />mea..ured al the agricultural ..ite, <br /> <br />The rderence "itc In Ihe Cull 1- <br />radl) Plaleau a)..,o had elevated ...edi- <br />menl cnnC('lllr:llion" .-\ny rain or <br />../lImn1l'1t t'\('nt in lhe...e area... tend... <br />lu "'llb~lantially inCfe;l,e lhe ,l'di- <br />llll'lH cnfh.:l'nlratiUlh Ill' ,tream, .:md <br />mer... hl'l.:au...e 01 till' high erodlhil. <br />ity oflhe "'01).., <br /> <br />- <br />.... <br />i\.) <br />W <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br />, <br />w <br />~if <br />~" <br />'--':::l <br />" " <br />z. <br />" " <br />? ," <br />0, <br />w < <br />6iS <br />L.O:::l <br />o ~ <br />!.::i <br />.. ~ <br />~ ~ <br />o <br />~ <br />z <br />. <br />C <br />" <br />, <br /> <br />200,,_ <br />"'! <br />160 ~ <br /> <br />Colclr.-doPl>l_ <br />~ <br /> <br />,~--~ <br /> <br /> <br />" <br />o <br /> <br />! <br />. <br />. <br />1 <br />~ <br />. <br /> <br />; <br />I <br />i <br />. <br /> <br />"J <br />I <br /> <br />....... <br />,- <br />....- <br /> <br />. <br />< <br />, <br />, <br />o <br />, <br />, <br />! <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />, <br />. <br />5 <br />t <br />, <br /> <br />I <br />o <br /> <br />! <br />. <br /> <br />Figure 15, Suspended-sediment <br />concentrations were greatest In the <br />agricultural areas of tt1e Colorado <br />Plateau. <br /> <br /> <br />Sed,m-ent and...'a1e'-quality sampling at l'leoo <br />WaSh ,Photograph b)' ~'~'r'\an Spah. US GeoIog' <br />oca1S"rveyl <br /> <br />BIOLOGICAL MEASURES INDICATE <br />THAT UCOl AGRICULTURAL AND <br />COLORADO PLATEAU MIXED LAND- <br />USE SITES RANK AMONG THE MORE <br />DEGRADED SITES NATIONAllY <br /> <br />The ck\':lled nutrient and sediment concentr.llions found in the agricul- <br />tural and surrounding areas of the Colorado Plateau help to explain the <br />prevalence of more tolerant biological species. Algal. invertebrate, and fish <br />communities in the Colorado Plateau generally consis.t of species more tol~ <br />erant 10 nutrients and sediment... The..c result III hight'r degradation rank. <br />ing~ for all three biological measures. The biological measures in lhe <br />Colorado Plateau indicate that agricultural and mixed land-use siles in the <br />VCOL are abow the national average in teml.. of degradation, These rank~ <br />ings compare VCOL agricultur.tl Sill''' lO mher Nt\\VQA agriL'ultural sites <br />and UCOL mixed land-use sites to other NA WQA mixed land-use sites <br />narionally. <br /> <br /> Biological indicator <br />Site name Algal Invertebrate Fish <br /> status status status <br /> - <br />Dry Creek ::::J . . <br />(agriculluralsite) <br />Reed Wash . . . <br />(agricultural site) <br />Colorado River near Cameo . ....J 0 <br />(Colorado Plateau mixed land use) <br />Gunnison River near Grand Junction . . . <br />(Colorado Plateau mi~ed land use) <br />Colorado River at State line . . 0 <br />(CoIOJado Plateau mixed land use) <br /> EXPlANATION <br />r~ Middle 50 percenl nationally <br />. Highesl25 percent nationally, most degraded sites <br /> <br />Explanation of Biological Rankings <br />llIc th~ 5Clected biological indicalors re~pond to changes in stream deg.ra- <br />dation. Degradation can resull from a \'ariet}' of faeton; truJt IlR-.dify habitat or <br />other environmental feature'S such as land use. watl"r chemi~lr)', and flow. Algal <br />status focuses on the changes in the percentage of eenam algae in respon$C 10 <br />iocreasing sillation and often is positivcl}' corrclalL>d with higher nutrient <br />con.:cnlration~ 1n man)' regions ofthc Nation. In\'cncDrate status is the a\'erage <br />of II in\ertd:lrate memcs that summarize changes in richnl"ss, IOleran~, <br />trophic cl;'nJitions. and dominance associated WIth ~aler-<!ualit)' degradation. <br />Fisb ~talUS focuses on changes in the percentage of tolerant fi~h s~cics thai <br />make up the 10lal numl>erof fi~h.. "Tolcralll"' fish are reponl"d to thrhe in <br />,kg:raded waterquah~. For all indicator<o. higher \ialuc~ indicale degraded ~ atef" <br />quality. <br /> <br />.\Iajor Finding.. 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.