My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06394
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06394
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:22:35 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:36:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8283.100
Description
Colorado River Computer Models - Colorado River Simulation System
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/20/1986
Author
Unknown
Title
Appendix A - 1986 Lower Colorado River Simulation Studies
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />00163tJ <br /> <br />Surplus Strategy (All Three Studies) <br /> <br />The model delivers surplus water to California {via The Metropolitan Water <br />District of Southern California (Metropolitan) and Arizona (via CAP), <br />beginning in January, for a full calendar year if the previous <br />end-of-December vacant reservoir storage space was less than 7.35 maf <br />(2 maf in excess of the minimum flood control space required by the <br />Hoover Dam - Lake Mead flood control regulations). <br /> <br />The amount of surplus water made available was the difference between CAP's <br />maximum capacity of 3,000 cubic feet per second and its normal delivery <br />schedule. This,volume of water over the calendar year permitted CAP to <br />pump at its capacity and Metropolitan (referred to as MWD in summary <br />information) to increase its diversion by the same surplus volume that is <br />diverted by CAP. Additionally, CAP and Metropolitan were assumed to pump <br />to their maximum capacity those volumes of water, in excess of downstream <br />water user requirements that result from Hoover Dam flood control releases. <br />The model considered Metropolitan capable of pumping surplus water <br />beginning in 1986 and CAP beginning in 1992. <br /> <br />Shortage Strategy (All Three ~tudies) <br /> <br />.:~ <br /> <br />The simulation of water shortage conditions in the Lower Basin was governed <br />by the assumption that should the Lake Mead elevation' fall below 1095 feet, <br />at the end of a calendar year, the subsequent year's diversion by CAP was <br />limited to 450,000 acre-feet. Beginning in 203Q, when Nevada is scheduled <br />to begin consuming its full apportionment, Arizona's s~are of the total <br />wa-ter shortage was 96 percent and born by CAP. Nevada's share of 4 percent <br />was borne by SNWP. <br /> <br />.;:.. <br /> <br />Scheduled Consumptive Uses (All Three Studies) <br /> <br />The Upper Colorado River Basin depletion schedule was taken from ,the <br />September 1984 "Projected Water Supply and Depletions, Upper Colorado River <br />Basin." It should be noted that while this was the depletion schedule used <br />for the 1985 CAP water supply study, the depletions estimated for the oil <br />shale industries and accompanying municipalities and industries have been <br />reduced in the State of Colorado. Primarily due to _Colorado's reduced <br />schedule, the resulting Upper Basin depletion schedule used for the current <br />studies was generally lower than that used in the earlier CAP water supply <br />study. <br /> <br />The Lower Colorado River Basin depletion schedule,was taken from the <br />September 1982 "Consumptive Use and Diversions from Mainstream." <br />Modifications to the September 1982 estimates were made for SNWP and CAP. <br />In the Lower Colorado River Basin, SNWP depletions were taken from the <br />October 18. 1983 "State of Nevada, Colorado River Water Budget." CAP's <br />scheduled diversions were taken from the Arizona Projects Office's <br />"ASSUMPTIONS FOR ESTIMATED CAP DELIVERY - EARLY YEARS," dated June 1985. <br />Annual diversion quantities were distributed by months according to a <br />percentage formula ~hich applies throughout the entire period of study. <br /> <br />'. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.