Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TWG Budget Ad hoc Group <br />GCMRC FY 06 Non-Experimental Budget and Work Plan Development <br />Queslion/Response Table <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />GCMRC's Please note that everything in the budget above line 156 is derived from power <br />Response to revenue, with the exception ofline #94 (temperature and habitat monitoring), which <br />General was inadvertently included in this section of the budget. This project will be moved <br />Comment below the line to join the other non-power revenue line items, <br />#6 <br />General 7 The differences between red and blue are unclear. Does the blue mean <br /> potentially unfunded, up for discussion or are they completed? May need more <br />(WAPA) colors or better clarification. <br />GCMRC's For greater clarification in the budget sheet, all cells in Column A of the spreadsheet <br />Response to that both contain a project number AND are highlighted in BRIGHT GREEN, are <br />General recommended by the GCMRC for budget approval and implementation during FY <br />Comment 2006, In revising the draft work plan, an additional section will be added to Chapter <br />#7 I, describing the slatus of all other projects that are listed in the budget table, but not <br /> associated with the above two criteria, <br />General 8 Show line items as completed if done and for what year it was completed. Don't <br /> list it as a zero. Example is line 112. <br />(WAPA) <br />GCMRC's See above response for General #7. <br />Response to <br />General <br />Comment <br />#8 <br />General 9 The findings and recommendations of the geomorphology (Februaf)' 2005, <br />(WAPA) workshop recommendations) need to be identified in the budeeted proiects. <br />GCMRC's Please recall that the FY06 workplan reviewed by BAHG in April was written prior <br />Response to to the geomorphology workshop. We will incorporate the information from the <br />General workshop and address these recommendations in the next version of the work plan, <br />Comment <br />#9 <br />General 10 Page 130 Task Groups <br />(WAPA) Are these funded? Are there tasks for them in 06? Clarify why they are <br /> discussed. <br />GCMRC's These Task Groups are not formally funded and no specific tasks are identified for <br />Response to the FY 2006 period, Any additional costs associated with such activities would need <br />General to be covered under the AMWGITWG requests category, or from a funded project <br />Comment specific to the required Task Group activity. The LTEP ad hoc should be identified <br />#10 as tied to the HCA (Glen Canyon Ooerations), etc. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Documenr Reference: FY06 Mas.er Draft AMP Budget - BOR GCMRC 02117/05 II :05 AM <br />