Laserfiche WebLink
<br />16 <br /> <br />TWG Budget Ad hoc Group <br />GCMRC FY 06 Non-Experimental Budget and Work Plan Development <br />Question/Response Table <br /> <br />(W AP A) <br /> <br />GCMRC's <br />Response to <br />Comment <br />#40 <br /> <br />41 <br />(W APA) <br /> <br />GCMRC's <br />Response to <br />Comment <br />#41 <br /> <br />42 <br />(Norm <br />Henderson) <br /> <br />GCMRC's <br />Response to <br />Comment <br />#42 <br /> <br />43 <br />(W APA) <br /> <br />recommendation? We need tbe PEP to define wbat sbould be done. Tbe cost <br />seems bigh for a researcb project to determine core monitoring. Wben this <br />monitoring is done, we would like to know if visitor use increases erosion at <br />cam able beaches. <br />See responses to Items 28 and 29, We would be happy to factor in the effects of <br />visitor use in evaluating erosion at campsites in a future monitoring program. Helen <br />will apprise the PEP reviewers that this is an interest of an AMP stakeholder. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Logistics Support <br />D1, for the first note, is the cost also sbowing somewhere else and double <br />funded? Tbis needs clarification. How does the burden a I to tbis? <br />Project D I Budget Table in the GCMRC workplan reflects a breakdown of full <br />logistics costs, Acluallogistics costs are distributed to each project line item in the <br />budget table, only direct logistics costs (equipment replacement & salaries) are listed <br />in the budget table line for logistics and therefore NOT double funded in the budget <br />table, Burden char es are a lied a ro riatel in the bud et table. <br />Line 130 and 132 (survey and control network) -It is difficult to understand <br />bow survey and control network elements are considered core monitoring. <br />Given that there is a great deal of emphasis no given to 1ST AR imagery that is <br />already orthorectified, what is the justification or rationale for additional <br />fundin for its continuation? <br />The mission of these two distinct yet related projects is to provide spatial data in <br />support of scientific investigations within the Grand Canyon CRE, These services <br />are required in support of Core Monitoring projects regardless of whether the data is <br />collected conventionally or by remotely sensed technologies, As such, the positional <br />accuracy of each dataset must be well defined locally (at a specific site or along a <br />short river reach) and regionally (throughout the length of the CRE), The data must <br />be correctly and consistently referenced to the National Spatial Reference System <br />(NSRS) for reliable use in Geographical Information Systems (GIS), The results of <br />a rigorously tested control network determines local and network accuracies of each <br />spatial data set, validates that contractors are meeting their stated accuracy <br />requirements, and assures GCD-AMWG is making decisions based on realistic and <br />reliable spatial data, Defining this hierarchy is critical since diverse methods are used <br />to determine positions, including remote sensing, conventional ground-based optical <br />methods, and the Global Positioning System (GPS). It is important to note that these <br />efforts are required by the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) as per <br />Executive Order 12906 and Office of Management and Budget Circular A-16, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Corrections to bud ettable 02 in the work Ian will be ad'usted as noted, <br />Part A - D2, correct tbe table, DOE 15% (or 02, 03, 04 and 05, they should be <br />moved to the totals. <br /> <br />Part B - D2fD3, are tbe control point databases and the geodectic control <br />network the same? We noted that on page 113, the title is consequences of 05 . <br />fundin , this should be 06. It sbould be corrected other laces in the document. <br /> <br />Document Reference: FY06 Master Oral! AMP Budget - BOR GCMRC 02117/05 11:05 AM <br />