Laserfiche WebLink
<br />002693 <br /> <br />,.' ,-<{\.,. <br /> <br />streamflow can increase sea-water incursion and <br />reduce seasonal flushing by floods; and (2) the <br />increase in use of water for irrigation and other <br />economic activity as a result of development increases <br />the waste loadings discharged to the estuary. <br />Irrigated agriculture, the largest present and future <br />consumptive use of water, results in greater salinity, <br />nutrients, and pesticide loads on surface and <br />groundwaters. Salinity is the most widespread water <br />quality problem of the Pacific Southwest, and the <br />most difficult to solve. <br /> <br />Natural sources of salinity and nutrients include: <br />(1) saline groundwater accretions, spring discharges, <br />and runoff in the Colorado River Basin; (2) saline <br />discharges from abandoned gas or oil wells in the <br />Tuolumne River Basin in California; and (3) the <br />nutrient-rich tributaries of Klamath Lake, Oregon, <br />and Clear Lake, California. <br /> <br />In the Colorado River Basin salinity problems are <br />most serious, and will continue to increase unless <br />constructive measures are implemented to alleviate <br />them. The 1965 level of Colorado River salinity was <br />about 590 mgfl (milligrams per liter, roughly <br />equivalent to parts per million) at Lee Ferry, and <br />about 840 mg/I at Imperial Dam - where <br />approximately 6 million acre-feet are diverted or <br />released annually, primarily for irrigation. The level <br />of salinity at Imperial Dam damages the agricultural <br />areas by reducing crop yield, by damaging salt-sensi. <br />tive plants, by increasing soil drainage problems, and <br />by increasing operation and maintenance costs. The <br />salinity of the Colorado River water also increases the <br />cost of treatment and service of suitable water to the <br />diverters for municipal, industrial and domestic use. <br />If water development projects are constructed as <br />projected in the framework plans and the river is not <br />augmented, and no salinity control measures are <br />taken, the salinity at Lee Ferry and at Imperial Dam <br />may increase as shown in figure 25. Reduction of the <br />above salinities by augmentation with better quality <br />water will vary depending on the amount and place of <br />augmentation in the Colorado River system and with <br />the amounts released to Mexico. <br />The impact of salinity increaseswill be negligible <br />in the Upper Colorado Region, although significant <br />increases in concentrations are projected. Some 10' <br />calized problems may occur. Increases in salinity, <br />however, in the lower reaches of the river basin are <br />greatly magnified, and are projected to have major <br />adverse impacts. <br />The level of salinity within the Lower Colorado <br />Region will be dependent upon the implementation <br />of a salinity control program within the entire Colo. <br />rado River Basin. Augmentation or desalting in the <br />Lower Basin are other possible solutions. <br />A salinity control program for the Colorado River <br />Basin has been included in the framework plan. <br /> <br />Water Quality <br /> <br /> <br />1500 <br /> <br />0: <br />W <br />I- <br />.J <br />;, 1000 <br />:Ii <br /><( <br />0: <br />(!) <br />::; <br />.J <br />:Ii <br /> <br />At Imperial Dam Without Program <br />k----t---- <br /> <br />A~ Imperial Dam With Program <br />/ <br /> <br />/. <br /> <br /> <br />At Lee Ferry Without Program <br />-- <br />-- <br /> <br />-- <br />- <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />>- 500 <br />!: <br />z <br />::; <br /><( <br />'" <br /> <br />At Lee Ferr With Pro ram <br /> <br />o <br />1965 <br /> <br />1980 <br /> <br />2000 <br /> <br />2020 <br /> <br />Fignre 25.-Colorado River water salinity. <br /> <br />Further detailed studies and pilot projects to deter- <br />mine the desirability and feasibility of the control <br />program are needed. Any depletions of water resulting <br />from measures included in the basinwide salinity <br />improvement program will have to be prorated to the <br />beneficiaries in accordance with the benefits. <br />Although not a serious problem now, confined <br />animal raising (feedlots, poultry "factories," etc.) is a <br />potentially serious water quality problem due to the <br />sheer magnitude of the projected waste loads from <br />this source. <br />Projected increases in recreation will result in an <br />increased amount of human waste disposal in land <br />and water areas. Some of these areas cannot accept <br />such disposal without serious effects on the local <br />water quality. <br />In the Great Basin, the combination of increa&jpg <br />consumptive use of water upstream and the rising <br />salinity and nutrient loadings will degrade terminal <br />lakes. All sewage waste water will be exported from <br />the Lake Tahoe Basin by 1972 in order to protect the <br />Lake's water quality. <br /> <br />Plan Response <br /> <br />The base plan includes source control and <br />treatment of pollutants as the most feasible means of <br />solving most water pollution problems. <br />Source control of municipal and industrial wastes <br />consists of providing a minimum of secondary <br />biological treatment or its equivalent. <br />Systems for treatment of irrigation drainage waters <br />to remove most polluting constituents have not yet <br /> <br />69 <br />