My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06338
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06338
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:22:18 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:34:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8277.600.10
Description
Big Sandy River Unit - Colorado River Salinity Control Program
State
WY
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
6/1/1986
Title
Findings of No Significant Impact and Environmental Assessment Summary
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OTHER ALTERNATIVES Atm PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT <br /> <br />The summaries of alternatives and public involvement presented <br />below were taken from the report entitled Big Sandy River, Colorado <br />River Basin Salinity Control Study, USDA Report, November 1980. <br /> <br />A local Coordinating Committee, comprised of two board members of <br />the Eden Valley Irrigation and Drainage District, all of the board of <br />supervisors for the Big Sandy Conservation District, an appointed member <br />from the Wyoming Governor's Office, and a representative from the BR <br />provided general guidance and a vehicle for local citizen input. The <br />Coordinating Committee reviewed the basic data and recommended several <br />on-farm irrigation management alternatives to increase irrigation <br />efficiencies and reduce deep percolation losses. In addition, the <br />Coordinating Committee requested that land retirement and irrigation <br />retirement alternatives also be analyzed. Eleven separate alternatives <br />were analyzed and presented to the Coordinating Committee and at a <br />public meeting. As a result of the public meeting, the Coordinating <br />Committee sent a questionnaire to all landowners to obtain their <br />preferences. <br /> <br />As a result of the questionnaire and public meeting, a landowner <br />preferred alternative (Alternative 11) and landowner preferred-modified <br />alternative (Alternative 12) were formulated. These alternatives were <br />analyzed and presented at a subsequent public meeting. General <br />consensus of the majority of landowners and the Coordinating Committee <br />was to select the "landowner preferred-modified alternative" <br />(Alternative 12). This modified alternative would retire from <br />irrigation about 87 percent (13,700 acres) of the irrigated area with <br />13 percent (2,000 acres) remaining under irrigation. <br /> <br />A large range of alternatives was evaluated during the course of <br />the salinity study. The alternatives range from no project action, <br />which did not reduce salinity from the project area, to various levels <br />of irrigation water management including irrigation retirement, which <br />provided greatest salinity reduction benefits. In addition to those <br />alternatives requested by the Coordinating Committee, two additional <br />alternatives were developed to meet two national objectives as specified <br />by "Principles and Standards for Water Related Land Resource Planning." <br />They were the National Economic Development (NED) (Alternative 8) and <br />Environmental Quality (EQ) (Alternative 13). <br /> <br />The alternatives evaluated and displayed in this report are listed <br />as follows: <br /> <br />Alternative 1 - Future Without a Project (No Action) <br /> <br />Alternative 2 - Improved Water Management and Minimum Structural <br />Improvements <br /> <br />Alternative 3 - Entire Project Area Sprinkler Irrigated (pumping <br />plant and pipeline distribution system) <br /> <br />GJL67 <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.