Laserfiche WebLink
<br />018~ <br /> <br />A total of 21 water samples from surface-water (stream and reservoir) <br />sites and 5 samples from ground-water sites were collected during the study. <br />.he State domestic-water-supply standard of 250 mg/L for sulfate (table 6) was <br />exceeded in 17' of the surface-water samples (tables 8-10) and in 4 of the <br />ground-water samples (table II). The only sites where this standard was not <br />exceeded were near the upstream end of the study area (sites AI, A3, and RI) <br />and the ground-water site at Syracuse (site G3), which may be recharged from <br />the sand-dune area. The State standard and U.S. EPA maximum contaminant level <br />of 10 ~g/L for selenium in domestic-water supply (table 6) was exceeded at <br />three surface-water sites (TI, T2, and A3) and in three ground-water sites <br />(GI, G2, and G4). Two of these surface-water sites (TI and T2) are tribu- <br />taries that contributed little streamflow to the Arkansas River at the time of <br />sampling. Sites A3, GI, and G2 are located in the area between La Junta and <br />John Martin Reservoir, where runoff from marine-shale areas seems to have its <br />most significant effect in the study area. The selenium concentration in <br />surface water from the La Junta area (site A3) was 17 ~g/L (table 8). The <br />concentration in ground water was 12 ~g/L at La Junta (site GI) and 29 ~g/L at <br />Las Animas (site G2), which is about 17 mi downstream from site Gl (table 11). <br />The other well in which selenium exceeded the drinking-water standard was at <br />Lakin (site G4). The concentration of selenium in a sample from that site was <br />12 ~g/L. <br /> <br />The highest concentrations of selenium measured in all the samples during <br />the study were 45 ~g/L at site Tl and 52 ~g/L at site T2 (table 8). These <br />concentrations exceed the U.S. EPA criteria for protection of aquatic life for <br />both chronic and acute exposure (table 5). They also exceed the Colorado <br />standard for chronic exposure but not for acute exposure. The State selenium <br />standards and U.S. EPA criterion for acute exposure were not exceeded at any <br />other surface-water sites (tables 8-10); however, the U.S. EPA criterion for <br />chronic exposure (5 ~g/L) was exceeded at four additional sites on the <br />Arkansas River (sites A2, A3, A6, and A7), at three reservoir sites in June <br />(sites R2, R4, and R5), and at one reservoir site in October (site R5). <br /> <br />The only other water-quality standard that was exceeded in any sample <br />was the chronic-exposure aquatic-life standard for mercury (0.1 ~g/L in <br />Colorado and 0.012 ~g/L in Kansas, table 5). The highest mercury concentra- <br />tions were detected at the most upstream sites (tables 8 and 9): Pueblo <br />Reservoir (site Rl, 0.6 ~g/L), the Arkansas River above Pueblo (site AI, 0.9 <br />~g/L), Fountain Creek (site TI, 0.5 ~g/L), and Lake Meredith (site R2, <br />0.6 ~g/L). Concentrations decreased downstream but exceeded the standard at <br />all stream sites except the most downstream location (site A7, Arkansas River <br />near Deerfield). The source of mercury seems to be upstream from the study <br />area, and the elevated concentrations probably are not caused by irrigation <br />return flow within the study area. The acute-exposure standard (2.4 ~g/L) was <br />not exceeded at any. site. <br /> <br />Concentration of trace elements, other than selenium and mercury, <br />generally were much lower than the most restrictive standards listed in <br />tables 5 and 6. The maximum cadmium concentration was 2 ~g/L, which might <br />have exceeded the aquatic life standard if the hardness was low. The lowest <br />hardness associated with 2 ~g/L of cadmium was 270 mg/L at site A2 (Arkansas <br />River near Nepesta). At this hardness level, the chronic-exposure standard <br />for cadmium is about 2.5 ~g/L. Lead concentrations were less than analytic <br /> <br />35 <br />