Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I}. <br /> <br />~3f\ <br /> <br />.... ;'" <br /> <br />."~II_lj~ <br /> <br />Romer supports bill <br />to set aside water <br />in wilderness areas <br />..' <br />, ",' <br />, . <br /> <br />,.:~nvironmentalists elated <br /> <br /> <br />By a.rry Noreen <br />. Gazette Telegraph <br />. DENVER. After weeks of si- <br />..tence, Gov. Roy Romer on Satur- <br />lday sided with the state's en. <br />. vironmentallobby by supporting <br />:;th.e notion that water in wilder- <br />'ness areas needs as much protec- <br />tion as the land. <br />t;. Speaking in Denver at a field <br />::hearing (or a Senate subcommit- <br />let. Romer supported Sen. Tlm <br />Wirth's wilderness proposal. <br />which is opposed by many Colo- <br />:rado Republica.rul and the state's <br />"water development community. <br />()pponents of Wirth's wilderness <br />say that reserving water <br />" t.s for wildemess purposes <br />uld hamper growth. <br />Some opponents have agreed <br />at because the lands included <br />,Wirth's bill are high altitude. <br />eadwaters areas, reserving the <br />ateT poses no threat to devel- <br />~ment. However, they fear that <br />e bill could affect potential <br />: . dawnstream wilderness areas <br />- 'that are not included in Wirth's <br />bOt.. <br />.t Siding with Wirth. Romer said <br />,V{e need to s.eparate out the <br />eadwaten lands from the other <br />lands, . ' , If downstream wilder- <br />jlrii'!M areas are proposed. we <br />1:'iiIbo~' t consider the water-rights <br />~ ~estion on a case-by-<:ase <br />buls." <br />~,.,~ For the past several weeks, <br />!Romer has declined to take a <br />;m'" bUe poSition on Wirth's bill. <br />publican Sen, Bill Armstrong <br />. as jolned with water providers <br />" . <br />i pushing for a provision that <br />auJd deny water rights to <br />ownstream wilderness areas <br />: .. ter on, even though they are <br />.i!" t Included in the current <br />egislation. <br />. . ;,While the governor strongly <br />~sU'pported Wirth's bill philo- <br />?5bphically, Romer withheld com- <br />'ment about the proposed wilder. <br />ness boundaries for the 750,000 <br />acres mentioned in the legisla- <br />.tion. He said he would have a <br />'~etai1ed position on boundaries <br />after leRislation by ArmstronR <br />'t <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />"I <br />' f downstream <br />wilderness areas <br />are proposed, we <br />must consider the <br />water-rights <br />question on a <br />case-by-case basis." <br />GOY. Roy Romer <br /> <br />and Rep. Ben Nighthorse Camp.. <br />bell is introduced. <br />Romer actually made his posi- <br />tion kno.....n Friday night at a re- <br />ception to honor the 25th annl. <br />versary of the national wilder. <br />ness bill. He had proclaimed Fri- <br />day as Wilderness Day in the <br />state. <br />Sierra Club spokt!swoman <br />~aggle fox hailed the gover. <br />nor's endorsement and said <br />Romer's support is "very <br />important. .. <br />Kirk K~psel of the Colorado <br />Environmental Coalition said "it <br />carri~ a little more wj'lght th;\t <br />he supports water rights" <br /> <br />C.l6 5tiJr <;;1' <br />U,(ViI at <br /> <br />\ <br />I <br />\ <br />