Laserfiche WebLink
<br />002G76 <br /> <br />MANAGfNG ESA ISSUES <br /> <br />HOLLAND & HART LLP <br /> <br />applies directly under the Act only to species of fish and wildlife listed as "endangered." <br />Section 4 provides that the Service can by regulation adopt a less expansive definition of <br />"take" for a threatened species, recognizing that more flexibility in both the nature of <br />proscribed activities and in the nature of the degree and type of management that can be <br />employed with respect to a given threatened species may be desirable, IS However, the <br />Service has promulgated a regulation making the full statutory definition of "take" <br />applicable to a threatened species, absent a special rule to the contrary. 16 There have <br />been few special rules promulgated to date (the grizzly bear rule, the Louisiana black <br />bear rule, and the California Gnatcatcher rule being the most notable exceptions). 17 The <br />Service's regulation applying "take" to threatened species, combined with the absence of <br />"special rules," suggests that the "take" prohibition ordinarily will apply to any listed <br />species of fish or wildlife, <br /> <br />The Section 9 protections for listed plants are distinct and incorporate state plant <br />protection law requirements. Section 9 makes it unlawful for any person to "remove and <br />reduce to possession" any listed plant from federal land areas, or to "maliciously damage <br />or destroy any such species on any such area" 18 That section also prohibits any person <br />to "remove, cut, dig up, or damage or destroy any [listed plant] species on any other area <br />in knowing violation of any law or regulation of any State or in the course of any <br />violation of a State criminal trespass law" 19 <br /> <br />The Service may issue a permit under ESA Section 10(a) to authorize the <br />"incidental take" of protected species. An incidental taking is one that is "incidental to, <br />and not the purpose of; the carrying out of an otherwise lawful activity. ..20 Similarly, for <br />activities subject to the federal consultation requirement of Section 7, the biological <br />opinion may include an incidental take statement authorizing such incidental take where <br />it will not jeopardize the species' continued existence21 The statement must include <br />reasonable and prudent measures that the Service deems necessary or appropriate to <br />minimize the impact of any incidental take on the species,22 <br /> <br />Two provisions of the Endangered Species Act are of special interest for the Act's <br />developing application to habitat and ecosystem conservation purposes. First, Section <br /> <br />I'See 16 U,S,c. ~ 1533(d). <br />1650 C.F,R. ~ 17,31. <br />17 See id, ~ 17.40(b), (i); ~ 17.41(b). <br />" 16 U.S,C, ~ 1538(a)(2)(B), <br />191d. <br /> <br />20 !d. ~ 1539(a)( I)(B). <br />21 50 C.F,R, ~ 402, 14(i). <br />n ld. <br /> <br />- 3 - <br />