Laserfiche WebLink
<br />('I - , ') I 0 <br />UU.L"''1 '- <br /> <br />GROUND \,ATER <br /> <br />In March 1978, the Bureau of Reclamation requested the Geological Survey <br />to conduct a study of the water supply potential of the Laramie-Fox <br />Hills aquifer in lower Coal Creek Basin in Adams, Boulder, Jefferson, <br />and Weld Counties. The water would be used to supplement the needs for <br />the communities of Louisville, Lafayette, and Erie, as the town of <br />Superior presently relies entirely on individual wells. The study <br />was 1 imited to the Laramie-Fox Hill s aquifer because it is the major <br />aquifer in the area wi th the most potential for ground-water develop- <br />ment. Calculations indicate that there are about 5 million acre-feet of <br />water in storage in this aquifer. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Yields from 91 wells ranged from 2 to 120 gallons per minute, and <br />averaged 18 gallons per minute. Generally, well yields increased <br />comparably with an increase in aggregate sand thickness. The thickness <br />of the aggregate sand ranged from 15 to 467 feet, and averaged 212 feet. <br />These yields did not necessarily reflect the maximum that could be <br />obtai ned in the area. Most of the exi sti ng well s were constructed for <br />domestic use, and with proper construction and larger capacity pumps, <br />increased yields could be obtained. <br /> <br />Water samples were analyzed from 14 wells and total dissolved solids <br />ranged from 171 to 2,910 mg/l and hardness from 8 to 2,000 mg/l. <br />Environmental Protection Agency maximum or recommended limits were <br />exceeded in water from 12 of the 14 wells by at least one of the <br />following: nitrate, selenium, fluoride, dissolved solids concentra- <br />tions, iron, manganese, and sulfate. <br /> <br />Based on the 5 million acre-feet of water available in the Laramie-Fox <br />Hills aquifer, there is adequate water to supply the annual demand for <br />8,000 acre-feet of additional water. However, areas of concern include <br />(1) the possibility that the aquifer may be tributary to Boulder Creek, <br />(2) the required pumpage will exceed the natural recharge to the aquifer <br />and ground-water mining will occur, (3) the potential well yields are <br />low, and (4) the chemical Quality of the water may require treatment if <br />it is to be used as a domestic and municipal water supply. The above <br />consi derati ons tend to rul e out ground water as a vi ab 1 e alternati ve <br />water supply, especially on a large-scale basis. <br /> <br />WATER QUALITY <br /> <br />The Boulder County (Marshall) landfill is located approximately <br />1/2-mil e northwest and approximately 120 feet in el evati on above the <br />Coal Creek streambed at the proposed Coal Creek Reservoir site. When <br />the moisture content of the buried refuse in landfills reaches satura- <br />tion, the soluble components are leached into the underlying soil and <br />ground water. <br /> <br />Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) have been found in surface water <br />samples taken on the landfill (EPA letter, March 20, 1980). Other <br />priori ty poll utants detected in surface water sampl es coll ected from <br /> <br />27 <br />