Laserfiche WebLink
<br />IMPACTS <br /> <br />1.37 Figures 1-27 through 1-29 present Some of the prominent impacts <br /> <br /> <br />of the Williams Fork alternatives and the reduction in impacts that <br /> <br /> <br />would result from potential mitigation measures. <br /> <br />1.38 Both <br />impacts: <br /> <br />alternatives would result in the following unmitigated <br /> <br />. Reduction in visual quality and <br />Reduction in quality of recreational experiences. <br /> <br />1.39 Water quality and channel stability would be improved with both <br />alternatives if all potential mitigation is implemented. <br /> <br />MITIGATION COSTS <br /> <br />1.40 A mitigation plan for the Williams Fork Gravity Collection <br /> <br /> <br />System was developed by the DWB. Mitigation for the Williams Fork <br /> <br /> <br />Pumping Collection System was developed by the Federal Government. <br /> <br /> <br />The DWB's mitigation plan cost estimates were reviewed and modified <br /> <br /> <br />where appropriate to be consistent with the Federal plans. In cases <br /> <br /> <br />where the DWB plan would not fully mitigate the impacts, additional <br /> <br /> <br />measures were added if available. If permits are issued, actual <br /> <br /> <br />mitigation measures will be determined after public comment on the <br /> <br /> <br />Final EIS. Figure 1-30 presents the DWB cost estimate, the Federal <br /> <br /> <br />estimate of the costs of the DWB mitigation plan, the costs of the <br /> <br /> <br />additional measures for the Williams Fork Gravity Collection System, <br /> <br /> <br />and the mitigation costs of the Williams Fork Pumping Collection <br /> <br /> <br />System. <br /> <br />1-29 <br />