My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06234
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06234
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:21:51 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:30:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.300
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - General Information and Publications-Reports
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
2/1/1974
Title
Salinity Management Options for the Colorado River
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />o <br /> <br />SALINITY MANAG~MENT OPTIONS FOR THE COLORADO RIVER <br /> <br />~ Phase I. Damage Estimate" and Control Program Impacts. <br />00 <br />0) Subtitle: Agricultural Consequen~es. <br />~ <br /> <br />A. IMPERIAL VALLEY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />The salient reservations of each of many possible approaches to predicting <br /> <br />the agricultural ~onsequences of increasing salinity has been thoroughly re- <br /> <br />viewed by Young, Franklin, and Nobe (1973). Their suggestion was that data <br /> <br />be sought in the areas being studied to obtain a better estimate of the <br /> <br />declination of crop yield as a function of Increasing salinity. Without <br /> <br />In situ comparisons of the conductivities of soil and irrigation water large <br /> <br />discrepancies can entel' the approximations. Bernstein (1962) states, <br /> <br />"In an ideally drained and irrigated soil, the electrical <br />conductivity of the saturation extract could approximate <br />half the value of the electrical conductivity of the <br />irrigation water as a lower limit, because the saturation <br />percentage of a soii is approximately twice the field <br />capacity. At the United States Salinity Laboratory, <br />this relationship generally obtains in artiflcally <br />sa Ii n i zed plots i rr' i 9ated throughout a season wi th <br />water of a <Jiven salinity. Under commercial conditions, <br />sllch idG,dly restd,.tcd salinity levels rarely occur. <br />Even in exec] len:, cit,.us orchards, the electrical con- <br />ductivity of the applid water at one depth or another <br />in the root zone (Chapman and Harding, 1956). Under <br />less favorable c.onditions with poorer management, much <br />highet' ratios develop." <br /> <br />A'number of things may contribute to the variation noted by Bernstein, <br /> <br />but drainage is the key. Drainage is closely associated with soil texture. <br /> <br />Extremely high salinity irrigation water has been used by Cavazza (1968) in <br /> <br />Italy. Reports indicate t:,at brackish water of 3% salinity has been used in <br /> <br />pugtia and Lucania. A maximum tolerance of 8% is reported for tomatoes. Tlli s <br /> <br />value is in excess of 20 mmho and much higher than utilized in the United States. <br /> <br />The key to this ability to use high salinity water is the sandy textured soil <br /> <br />which is well drained.. In the same publication Boyko (1968) reports on the <br /> <br />desert garden of Eilat where 2,000 to 6,000 mgll water is being used on sandy <br /> <br />soils for a host of plant species. Van Hoorn et al. (1968) using water of <br /> <br />4-5 gll report excellent yields of wheat, maize, sorghum, alfalfa, cotton, <br /> <br />beans, asparagus, tomatoes, and melons in Tunisia on a well drained soil. <br /> <br />Durand (1956) established :on irr.jgatlon water evaluation system which incorporates <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.