My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06234
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06234
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:21:51 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:30:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.300
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - General Information and Publications-Reports
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
2/1/1974
Title
Salinity Management Options for the Colorado River
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />C::J <br /><-.:l <br />~ <br />CD <br />(:, <br />... <br /> <br />Eastern MWD 29,620 acre feet, MWD of Orange County 31,470 acre feet, Western MHD <br />of Riverside County 33,713 acre feet, Monroe (1972). With the exception of the <br />San Diego CHA aquaduct #1, these areas will have blended 5~k state water available. <br />In the mid or late 1980's the blend will move to 75% state water. It should be <br />noted at this point that In the 5~k Colorado River water that the TDS could move <br />to 1,230 ppm and to 2,210 ppm in the 25% Colorado River water when mixing with <br />250 ppm state water without Increasing the TDS In the blend beyond the present <br />740 ppm value of Colorado River water. The cost to the agricultural economy <br />receiving the blended water will be the Increased price since there will probably <br />be no reduction in yield due to salinity increase above the present value. <br />Even though the Increased price of blended water was politically derived by <br />the MWD board of directors and may not reflect the true cost of obtaining the water, <br />It still remains the actual cost Increase to those farming. The surcharges for <br />the blended 5~k Colorado River water will be, Clinton (1973): <br />1974-75 $5/ac. ft. 1978-79 $ 9 <br />1975-76 $6 1979-80 $10 <br />1976-77 $7 1980-2000 $10 <br />1977-78 $8 <br />In the 75% state water blended the increased charge would be $15 per acre foot as <br />presently planned, Clinton (1973). <br />The study of yield effects of Increased salinity In the Pacific Coast area <br />then narrows to the region served by the first San Diego aquaduct with a capacity <br />of 190 cfs, It should be noted at this point that the second San Diego aquaduct <br />has pipeline 3 with a capacIty of 250 cfs and pipeline 4 with a capacity of 380 <br />cfs. The pipelines 3 and 4 will have blended state water available in 1975. As <br />presently planned pipelines I and 2 of the first aqua duct are to have Colorado <br />River water exclusively until 1980-1985, Montgomery (1974). The four preferred <br />filtration distribution studies suggested by SDCWA, Montgomery (1974), all Indi- <br />cate that pipelines 1 and 2 will receive water from Skinner plants which would be <br />blended water during the second phase of construction 1980-1995, Montgomery (1974). <br />Metropolitan Water District of Southern California indicates plans to supply <br />blended water to pipelInes 1 and 2 by 1987-88 which Is the same time that the <br />blend will go to 75% state water, Clinton (1973). <br />The data developed in this study of yield decreases from increased salinity <br />In the Colorado will apply only to unblended water. The assumption made is that <br />the Irrigation water Is unsoftened Colorado River water. <br />Mean yields for the San Diego County area were obtained from the Agricultural <br />Commissioner Reports 1968-73, Little (1968-73), and are shown In tables 46 and <br />60. Table 46 showing the partitioning of acreages of crops into three permeability <br />46 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.