Laserfiche WebLink
<br />C) <br />o <br />~.. <br />CO <br />. -.J <br />c;p <br /> <br />approximately 2 mmhc~m greater saturation extracts than those growing in the <br />chloride treated s0ils at the Salinity Lab. Similar findings are reported by <br />Shoshin (1955) as cited by Stroganov (1962) and Doneen (1963). Declination <br />yield curves were based upon the CiJllfornia Committee of Consultants' Report <br />and inter[.lreted with a 2 mmho/cm increase when comparing soil saturation <br />extracts from projected values. <br /> <br />PROCEDURE <br />The base point of the soil extract conductivities was determined from <br />mean values of soi I extracts taken from 33 locations twice yearly over a 10- <br />year period on four 5011 classifications on the Imperial Valley Field Station. <br />The 95% confidence intervals of these samples are presented in table 3. A <br />similar interval was determined for the irrigation water conductivity. The <br />ratios of the mean soil saturation extracts to the mean conductivity of the <br />Irrigation water is shown in table 4. The median of each ratio was utilized <br />to project the soil salinity which developed with tne current best practice <br />on that soil, as defined in Guidelines Imperial County Crops Circular 104 <br />(1973) . <br /> <br />In view of the statement, <br /> <br />"At present our ability to predict changes in soli <br />solution concentration during infiltration and <br />drainage has not been ascertained. Theoretical <br />and experimentai analysis involving nonsteady flow <br />conditions are both meager and incomplete.1I <br /> <br />Nielsen (1972). This study wi II assume that the ratio between the conductivity <br />of soi I saturation extl-acts and the conductivity of the irrigation water wi 11 <br />remain constant. <br />Consultation with Robert Zimmerman, Soil Conservation Service, produced <br />the acreages of the major soli classifications in the Imperial Valley. He <br />also Indicated the general distribution of crops on each soil class, table 5. <br />Mean crop yields and acreage were obtained from 1965 to 1972 from the <br />Annual Crop Reports, Agricultul'al Commissioner, Imperial County Courthouse. <br />These are shown in table 6. <br />Utilizing the Fc regression as a function of TDS from table I and the <br />median ratios from table 4, table 7 was constructed indicating a projected <br />median conductivity of a saturated soil extract at different TON levels. <br />The irrigation management influence was defined as a function of tho <br />zone from which water was e;<tracted from the soil. When intervals were Ions <br />enough to require 13.3 cm application (16 irrigations per year), the sa1inity <br /> <br />17 <br />