Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />'I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />II <br />il <br />I <br />I .' <br />I I. <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.. ._ -J. or <br />. , . <br /><::'J' <br /> <br />AlTACHMENT1 <br /> <br /><:" <br /> <br />HELTON & WlWAMSEN, P.C. <br />CONSULTING ENGINEERS IN WATER RESOURCES <br />384 INVERNESS DRIVE SOUTH. SUITE 115 <br />ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80112' <br />PHONe (303) 792~lSl <br />FAA (303) 792~1B5 <br /> <br />N <br />00 <br /><..~ <br />Q") <br /> <br />August 8, 1997 <br /> <br />Mr. Steven J. Witte <br />Colorado Division of Water Resources <br />310 E. Abriendo, Suite B <br />Pueblo. Colorado 81004 <br /> <br />Subject: Supplementallnfonnation for Replacement Plan Amendment - <br />Lower Arkansas Water Management Association <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Witte: <br /> <br />This letter supplements the information concerning the historical use of LAWMA's <br />interests in the Highland Irrigation Company. Our eari/er correspondence, dated July 10, 1997. <br />requested that the Highland Canal water be included as a replacement source for LAWMA's <br />1997 plan. We submitted an amendment to the replacement plan on August 1 in which we <br />agreed to present an analysis of the historical use of the Highland Canal consistent with the <br />algorithm and parameters used in Kansas' H-I model. This letter presents the results of that <br />analysis. <br /> <br />I conferred with Dewayne Schroeder about the data and procedures used in the H-I <br />model. The Highland Canal was not Included in Kansas' analyses of Colorado irrigation <br />ditches, so the parameters used in this analysis are based on information for similar ditches <br />included in the H-I model. In general, the H-I model performs a water budget analysis in which <br />irrigation deliveries are inflow to the root zone and crop consumptive use, tall water and deep <br />percolation are outflow. The soli acts as a reservoir, and when the root zone is full, excess <br />applications are assigned to deep percolation. The model also accounts for canal and lateral <br />seepage. The canal seepage rate is based on the canal length. For the Highland Canal, the <br />seepage rate is calculated to be about 10 percent of the diversion. The lateral seepage has off- <br />fann and on-farm components. The lateral seepage rate used for all Colorado ditches was 7 <br />percent. One-half of this rate, or 3.5 percent. is applied to the canal diversion volume and one- <br />half, 3.5 percent. Is applied to the fann delivery. Tall water for all ditches is calculated as 1Q <br />percent of the farm delivery less on-farm lateral losses. In the recent H-I model version. the <br />maximum Irrigation efficiency for Colorado ditches was limited to 65 percent. except for the <br />LamarlManvel and Colorado Canals which were set at 70. percent The irrigation efficiency <br />Includes on-farm lateral seepage, tall water and deep percolation losses. Using a maximum <br />efficlency of 65 percent. the minimum deep percolation rate worKs out to be about 22.6 percent <br />of the fann delivery less on-farm lateral losses, <br /> <br />TheH-I model also calculates "secondary evaporation" (BEV) on the canal seepage, off- <br />fann and on-farm lateral seepage and tan water, Following are the monthly SEV rates: <br /> <br />E.J\)~...(c... S- (WI'\t) <br />