Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I 'c., <br />(~1 <br />ro <br /> 00 <br />I f\) <br />CO <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Memorandum to Steven J. Witte <br />April 30, 1998 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Consumptive Irriaation Reauirements <br /> <br />The consumptive irrigation requirements were calculated using the modified Blaney- <br />Criddle method with temperature and precipitation data for Las Animas and the crop distribution <br />shown in Table 1. The values were calculated for 1938 through 1993 but only the post-compact <br />years, 1950 throu9h 1993, are summarized. The resulting consumptive irrigation requirements <br />in inches are shown in Table 2. The consumptive irrigation requirements for 2,998.7 acres <br />averaged 7,104 acre-feet annually and ranged from 6,183 acre-feet in 1958 to 8,284 acre-feet in <br />1963 as shown in Table 3. <br /> <br />Diversion Reauirement <br /> <br />The theoretical diversion requirement for 2,998.7 acres was calculated by dividing the <br />monthly consumptive irrigation requirements by the maximum fann efficiency, 65 percent, and <br />by the conveyance efficiency, 86.5 percent. The conveyance efficiency is the result of canal <br />losses of 10 percent and off-fann lateral losses of 3.5 percent. These factors are based on <br />parameters used in the H-I Model for Arkansas River ditches. As shown in Table 4, the <br />diversion requirements averaged 12,635 acre-feet annually and ranged from 10,997 acre-feet in <br />1958 to 14,733 acre-feet in 1963. <br /> <br />Consumptive Use <br /> <br />Consumptive use has the following two components: 1) crop evapotranspiration, and 2) <br />secondary evaporation and transpiration (SEV) of water lost through canal and lateral seepage <br />and farm tailwater. In 1998, LAWMA will continue to operate the entire length of the canal so <br />the canal loss portion of the SEV will not be available. The SEV was calculated by multiplying <br />the monthly SEV rate by the sum of the off-fann lateral seepage, on-fann lateral seepage, and <br />fann tailwater. As shown on Table 5, the total consumptive use averaged 7,793 acre-feet <br />annually and ranged from 6,763 acre-feet in 1958 to 9,099 acre-feet in 1952. Annually, the <br />consumptive use waS' 61.7 percent of the average annual diversion requirement for 2,998.7 <br />acres. We propose to establish a maximum annual limit of 9,099 acre-feet of stream credits for <br />3,569 shares and a running 10-year volume of 77,930 acre-feet. For 1998, tAWMA will-own <br />3,382 shares, so the annual limit should be 8,622 acre-feet (9,099 x 3,382/3,569). When <br />LAWMA begins accounting for its water by use of a river gage near the Highland diversian, the <br />maximum annual and 10-year total limitations will be adjusted ta account for SEV from canal <br />loss. <br /> <br />Stream DeDletion Factors <br /> <br />Manthly stream credit factors were calculated using H-I Model parameters as described <br />in our August 8, 1997 letter which is enclosed as Attachment 1. Those stream credit factors <br />were displayed as a percentage of river diversions. In 1998, LAWMA will deliver its pra rata <br />share of the water back ta the Purgatoire River at Wasteway No. 3 as it did last year. <br />Accordingly, the monthly factors were adjusted to reflect continued operation of the canal so <br />that credit is not taken for secondary evaporation attributable to canal losses. The calculation of <br />the depletion factors for 1998 are shown in Table 6. We understand that you would like us ta <br />derive factors for calculation of delayed winter return flow obligations. The winter return flow <br />obligations total 3.4 percent of the total annual credits. The winter return flow factors are <br />calculated as 3.4 percent of values shown in row 18 of Table 6. Net credit is the difference <br /> <br />E.,Jo~~r\- S (eo.!) <br />