Laserfiche WebLink
<br />fUnction for the Sand Creek reservoir was constrained by the <br />limited water yield of the Sand Creek basin and the cost of <br />acquiring additional recreation lands. The incremental benefits <br />of providing additional recreational lands would not justify <br />the costs of acquiring such lands. The water yield of the <br />basin is so limited that in order to l\IB.intain a permanent pool <br />for recreation purposes, it would be necessary to import water <br />into the basin. Although the probability of importing water <br />is small, it is a real possibility for the future. In light <br />of the above considerations, the project's recreation fUnction <br />was formulated without permanent storage in the reservoir. The <br />recreation plan was developed to use the project lands most <br />effectively and efficiently. Provisions were made in the <br />recreational development plan to incorporate a permanent pool <br />if a source of water is found. <br /> <br />c. In order to provide a ballis for selecting a size for <br />the Sand Creek reservoir, studies were conducted to determine <br />the economic optimum scale of development. Several levels of <br />flood control storage were analyzed, including storage of the <br />l-percent, standard project, and probsble maximum flOOds. The <br />costs and flood control benefits attributable to each level were <br />developed and compared. The results of this analysis indicate <br />that a reservoir capable of storing the standard project flood <br />below the spillway crest would maximize net tangible benefits. <br />In view of such intangible considerations as providing protec- <br />tion against the potential loss of lives, the protection of the <br />general health and welfare of the Denver area, the provision of <br />an adequate degree of flood control for Sand Creek basin resi- <br />dents, and the prevention of disruptions of community activi- <br />ties, the maximum feasible level of flood control storage in the <br />Sand Creek reservoir was adopted. The reservoir, therefore, was <br />sized to tsle 1'UlI advantage of the site capacity by perching <br />the spillway 17 feet above the standard project flood. <br /> <br />d. Toll Gate Creek dam and reservoir. To provide for the <br />laO-year accumulation of sediment, an allowance of 2,000 acre- <br />feet was made in the Toll Gate Creek reservoir. As in the case <br />of the Sand Creek reservoir, the water yield from the basin <br />upstream from the Toll Gate Creek reservoir is insufficient to <br />support permanent storage for recreation. The recreation plan <br />for the Toll Gate Creek reservoir, therefore, was formulated to <br />develop the project lands for park-type facilities but without <br />a lake for recreation. Care was taken in developing the plan, <br />however, to insure that a permanent recreation pool could be <br />added in the future if a source of water is found. <br /> <br />e, Studies of various levels of flood control storage in <br />the Toll Gate Creek reservoir were conducted in the same manner <br /> <br />53 <br />