My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06225
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06225
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 10:15:55 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:30:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8059
Description
Section D General Studies-State Water Plan
State
CO
Date
1/1/3000
Author
CorpsofEngineers
Title
State Water Plan Potential Projects-Information on the Potential Plans of Improvement in the Sand and Toll Gate Creeks Basin-An Extraction from the Corps of Engineers Interim Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />corollary improvement of flood channels, establishment of <br />floodvays, provision of recreation facilities, and treatment <br />of the basin's waste vater effluent. Localized projects for <br />eliminating threats to bridges, bridge approaches, and public <br />vorks can best be developed on an individual basis under <br />existing authorities. <br /> <br />25. SITE SELECTION CRITERIA <br /> <br />The folloving criteria governed the selection of sites for <br />flood control impoundments: <br /> <br />a. The location should control a significant proportion of <br />the drainage area to ~aterially reduce the threat of high residual <br />flood runoff; <br /> <br />b. The site capacity must be adequate to permit develop- <br />ment of the high degree of flood control essential for protection <br />of urban areas; <br /> <br />c. The site must be suitable from an engineering standpoint <br />for construction of embankment and outlet facilities without <br />excessive cost; <br /> <br />d. The degree of flood control provided must yield suffi- <br />cient econo~ic benefits to justify investment costs; and <br /> <br />e. Insofar as is practicable, the site should be adjustable <br />to the developllent of allied project purpolles 'to meet existing <br />and anticipated requirements. <br /> <br />26. SITE SELECTION <br /> <br />a. Sand Creel< dam and reservoir. Severe.l potential upstream <br />reservoir sites along Sand Creek and its tributaries, Coal and <br />Murphy Creel<s, were investigated during the preliminary screening <br />process. Sites along Sand Creek and Murphy Creek contain high- <br />vays and pover lines and the costs of relocating these facilities <br />vould be prohibitive. A reservoir site, located on Coal Creek <br />about 3 miles upstream from the confluence of Coal and Murphy <br />Creeks, contained little development and offered sufficient <br />topographic relief to develop a high degree of control of poten- <br />tial flood runoff. This site, vhich is referred to as the Sand <br />Creek dam and reservoir site in this report, vas selected for <br />detailed study. <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br />-1 <br /> <br />51 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.