My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06225
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06225
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 10:15:55 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:30:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8059
Description
Section D General Studies-State Water Plan
State
CO
Date
1/1/3000
Author
CorpsofEngineers
Title
State Water Plan Potential Projects-Information on the Potential Plans of Improvement in the Sand and Toll Gate Creeks Basin-An Extraction from the Corps of Engineers Interim Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />(3) Downstream areas. The solutions considered for <br />reducing the flood problems in the areas along the Cherry Creek <br />channel downstre~ from the Cherry Creek Dam i",luded zoning, <br />evacuation, flood proofinr" channel improvements, levees, and <br />reservoir storage. <br /> <br />(a) ZoninF;, evacuation, and flood proofing. Down- <br />stream from the Cherry Creek Dam, flood plain development ranges <br />from undeveloped to fully developed. The undeveloped areas are <br />located near the earn. The flood plain between the dam and the <br />~;outh Platte 'River contains extensive residential, cor.unercial, <br />and industrial improvements. In addition, flood plain lands con- <br />tain numerous streets and hir,hways essential to the economic <br />environment of the Hetropolitun l1envcr aren. Since A. major <br />portion of the flood plain is fully developed, zoninG would not <br />be an effective solution to the flood problem and the cost of <br />evacuation would be prohihitive. Due to the extensive develop- <br />ment downstream from the Cherry Creek Dom, a large number of <br />structures woul,l have to be modified and flood proofed to reduce <br />flood damages. ~lood proofing of existing structures would cost <br />in exceSs of $50 million. Because the areas subject to future <br />development are relatively small, improvements may be an effective <br />method of reducing future flood damages. <br /> <br />(b) CI,annel improvement. Studies were made to <br />determine the feasibility of channel improvements between the <br />Cherry Creek Dam and the South Platte River. Thene studies con- <br />sidered the use of existinG chrulllel structures and rights of way <br />in developing potential channel improvement projects. It was <br />found that construction of channel improvements providing protec- <br />tion against a standard project flood would be economically <br />feasible. <br /> <br />(c) Levees. ConstI'uction of levees along Cherry <br />Creek downstream from the dam would require the modification and <br />raising of bridges along Cherry Creek. Bridge approaches and <br />adjoining streets would have to be raised. Near the channel, <br />streets would be higher than entrances to buildings, and serious <br />drainage problems would result. Because of these disadvantages, <br />levees would not be an acceptable solution to the flood problem. <br /> <br />(d) Reservoir storage. Goldsmith Gulch is the <br />largest contributo~ of runoff downstream from the Cherry Creek <br />Dam. Flood plains along Goldsmith Gulch are extensively developed, <br />and all potential reservoir sites have been preempted. Construc- <br />tion of flood control reservoirs along Goldsmith Gulch would be <br />impractical. <br /> <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.