Laserfiche WebLink
<br />f' ') ~ 31 <br /> <br />DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />ate a reservoir with a total storage capacity of 109,250 <br />acre-feet (70,700 active and 38.550 inactive). At max- <br />imum capacity elevation, 5.017 feet (1.528 m), the <br />reservoir would produce a body of water approximate- <br />ly 11.7 miles (19 km) long (13,5 river miles) with a <br />maximum width of 0.7 miles (1,13 km) (Figure 2-6). <br />About 1.980 surface acres (801 ha) would be inun- <br />dated when the reservoir was filled to capacity. At the <br />minimum water surface elevation of 4,970 feet (1.514 <br />m). the reservoir surface would inundate approximate- <br />ly 1.128 acres (456 ha) and would extend 6.5 miles <br />(10,5 km) upstream from the dam, Maximum depth of <br />the reservoir from streambed to service spillway crest <br />would be 127 feet (39 m), The area-capacity curves for <br />the reservoir are shown in Figure 2-7. <br /> <br />As discussed in Chapter 1. Purpose and Need sec- <br />tion, the applicant has projected that the project would <br />deplete up to 75.000 acre-feet (104 cfs) plus approx- <br />imately 5.500 acre-feet of evaporation. The 75.000 <br />acre-foot figure is slightly higher than the active stor- <br />age of 70.700 acre-feet. This would not present a <br />probiem because the present inflow to the reservoir <br />(1931-1980 record at Watson) is 479,500 acre-feet. <br /> <br />Also with the present flows and the proposed run-of- <br />the-river operation. the surface level would remain <br />high. averaging 5.5 feet of drawdown during normal <br />years, Under these conditions. a large percent of the <br />fiows entering the reservoir would be released. Only in <br />periods of extreme drought would the reservoir be <br />drawn down to or near the inactive storage level. <br /> <br />Vegetation in the fluctuation zone (47 feet) (14 m)of <br />the reservoir would be removed and burned or buried, <br />as would dead falls below the dead storage level. <br /> <br />Outlet Works <br /> <br />The outlet works would consist of a 1 O-foot diameter <br />(3 m) penstock (water supply pipe to the power gener- <br />ating turbines). a 36-inch diameter (91.4 cm) bypass <br />pipe, and an intake structure. The penstock and <br />bypass pipe would be encased in reinforced concrete. <br />as shown in Figure 2-8, and would be supported on <br />undisturbed bedrock. The intake for the outlet pipes <br />would consist of a tower and three gated openings <br />located at various levels and an ungated inlet box <br />located at the base of the dam, These outlets are <br />designed to release water at various temperatures, <br />The gates would provide for emergency closure to <br />enable inspection and maintenance of the pipes. The <br />bypass outlet would be used to maintain downstream <br />releases if the power plant were to be shut down. <br /> <br />Spillways <br /> <br />SERVICE SPILLWAY <br /> <br />The service spillway would be a reinforced concrete <br />structure on the left (south) abutment (Figure 2-4) with <br /> <br />an uncontrolled overflow crest elevation of 5.017 feet <br />(1.528 m) and a capacity of 9.300 cfs. This capacity <br />would be sufficient to pass a 1 OO-year flood. The ser- <br />vice spillway would discharge into a stilling basin ener- <br />gy dissipator near stream level below the dam. During <br />May and June there would be up to 1.500 cfs offlow in <br />the spillway 4 out of 10 years and no flow in the <br />remaining months. <br /> <br />AUXILIARY SPILLWAY <br /> <br />An auxiliary spillway located south of the dam abut- <br />ment would be designed to accommodate flows to <br />86.000 cfs. The crest of the auxiliary spillway would be <br />at an elevation of 5.019 feet (1.529 m) and would have <br />a length of 1.500 feet (457 m). A road would be located <br />across the crest of the spillway as shown in Figure 2-4, <br />The existing natural draw (into which flood flows from <br />the auxiliary spillway would discharge) would be en- <br />larged and graded, This spillway would be used in an <br />extreme flood emergency to provide for the structural <br />safety of the dam. <br /> <br />Material Sources <br /> <br />Approximately 2.600.000 cubic yards (1.987,960 <br />m') of material would be needed to construct the var- <br />ious zones of the dam embankment. Most of the mate- <br />rial would be obtained from the excavation for the <br />auxiliary spillway, shown in Figure 2-4. <br /> <br />The rock excavated for the access road, outlet <br />works. and power house would also be incorporated <br />into the embankment as rockfill and riprap. It is antici- <br />pated that as much as 925.000 cubic yards (707,255 <br />m') of rockfill would be excavated. <br /> <br />In addition to the above on-site borrow material <br />areas, two off-site borrow areas have been identified <br />as potential sources for material for the embankment <br />and inner core. The areas are shown in Figure 2-9. <br />Site 1 . located east of Utah State Highway 45. north of <br />Bonanza. has a surface area of approximately 450 <br />acres (182 halo Site 2. on the west side of Utah State <br />Highway 45. adjacent to Site 1, has a surface area of <br />approximately 432 acres (175 halo A total of approx- <br />imately 120,000 cubic yards (91.752 m3) of material <br />could be required from these sites for construction of <br />the dam, <br /> <br />Two sources are being considered for sand and <br />gravel required for concrete aggregate: terrace de- <br />posits upstream from the dam and a commercial <br />source near Jensen, Utah. In either case, the material <br />would have to be processed to satisfy concrete aggre- <br />gate requirements. <br /> <br />Construction <br /> <br />Dam construction would require about 2 years and <br />15 to 50 workers on schedule. Figure 2-10 shows the <br /> <br />21 <br />