My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06202
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06202
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:21:44 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:29:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.765
Description
White River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
6/6/1982
Author
DOI
Title
White River Dam Project - Final Environmental Impact Statement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
376
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />n:'j?19t) <br />U:J L~_ <br /> <br />PURPOSE AND NEED <br /> <br />essential. The proposed water development project or <br />alternatives could be important in support of acceler- <br />ated energy development in the oil shale region of <br />eastern Utah. <br /> <br />local Socioeconomics <br /> <br />It is estimated that approximately 20 to 50 workers <br />would be needed to construct the White River Dam <br />and associated facilities. including the hydroelectric <br />power plant (Bingham Engineering 1982). Preliminary <br />projections indicate that workers would live in existing <br />communities and commute to the job rather than live <br />near the project site. Questions raised include: What <br />changes, if any. are anticipated in terms of local <br />socioeconomic conditions. I.e.. quality of life and eco- <br />nomic conditions? <br /> <br />Water <br /> <br />The Utah Board of Water Resources has an objec- <br />tive to develop a part of its water right filing on the <br />White River primariiy for energy development. This is <br />an important issue due to growing needs for water, <br />limited availability. problems associated with water <br />quality. potential changes in ground and surface wa- <br />ter. and cumulative impacts of water uses and its <br />relationship to ecosystems. <br /> <br />In May 1965, the Utah Board of Water Resources <br />filed to appropriate 250.000 acre-feet from the White <br />River and tributaries for the purpose of mining, drilling.. <br />and retorting oil shaie and other energy-reiated proj- <br />ects (I.e.. hydroelectric power generation). A water <br />need has been identified for the oil shale processing <br />by the White River Oil Shale Project. Magic Circle <br />Energy. Syntana-Utah. Tosco Development, Paraho <br />Development. and Enercor-Mono Power. The Ute In- <br />dian Tribe of Fort Duchesne. Utah. has Winters Doc- <br />trine rights on the White River with a potential to irri- <br />gate several thousand additional acres of unde- <br />veloped land. Concern was expressed that added <br />withdrawal of surface water and return flows from irri- <br />gated lands could increase salinity concentrations in <br />the Green River. <br /> <br />Recreation <br /> <br />Current recreational uses of the White River in Utah <br />include: limited fishing for catfish; hunting for deer, <br />coyote. waterfowl. and upland game birds; and rec- <br />reational boating including canoeing. particularly dur- <br />ing the high flows of early summer. Scenic and primi- <br />tive values and opportunities for solitude are experi- <br />enced by some. Access roads provide limited opportu- <br />nities for camping near the river. <br /> <br />Other Issues <br /> <br />The impacts of the White River Reservoir on future <br />oil shale processing near the proposed reservoir con- <br /> <br />cerned some people, particularly the potential seep- <br />age of water from the reservoir into oil shale bearing <br />formations. <br /> <br />Also of concern were cultural and paleontological <br />values that might be affected by project construction <br />activities and inundation by the reservoir. A historic <br />site, Ignatio Stage Stop, with its remaining rustic build- <br />ings, would be inundated by the reservoir. <br /> <br />The White River and adjacent river bottoms supply <br />water. forage. and other needs for wildlife and domes- <br />tic livestock. The riparian vegetation zones are an <br />essential part of these ecosystems. <br /> <br />A native desert aquatic ecosystem is considered <br />important by some. likewise the possible creation of a <br />recreational fishery is considered important by others. <br />The Colorado River Basin has been greatly altered in <br />the last 75 years. Most of the major tributaries are <br />altered by dams or diversions. The White River and <br />the Yampa River are the only unregulated tributaries <br />of any size remaining in the Upper Colorado Basin. <br />This would suggest that the White River ecosystem Is <br />significant and has considerable scientific as well as <br />aesthetic value. <br /> <br />An exploratory oil drill hole located near the White <br />River currently oozes thick crude oil and could be a <br />pollution problem if not properly capped. <br /> <br />Some suggested that the analysis of project needs <br />and alternatives address the issue of water use tech- <br />nology by improved processes that could decrease <br />the amount of water development required in the area, <br />The issue of sedimentation and its effects on the life of <br />the reservoir were also suggested for thorough analy- <br />sis, <br /> <br />INTERRELATED PROJECTS <br /> <br />Interrelated projects in various stages of planning <br />are important to the assessment of regional and <br />cumulative impacts. They are briefly noted here, <br /> <br />The Deseret Generation and Transmission Coop- <br />erative (Deseret) is composed of six rural electric <br />cooperatives serving owner customers in Utah and <br />contiguous areas of Wyoming. Colorado. Arizona. and <br />Nevada. Deseret is constructing the Bonanza (former- <br />ly called Moon Lake) coal-fired steam electric power <br />generating station to begin operation in late 1984. <br /> <br />Two sites within the White River drainage in western <br />Colorado are being investigated by Water Users Asso- <br />ciation NO.1 of the Colorado River Water Conserva- <br />tion District for water storage. One site is located on <br />the White River near the mouth of Taylor Draw. while <br />the other is located on the White River near the conflu- <br />ence of Wolf Creek, <br /> <br />Other related projects on the Upper Green River <br />and its tributaries include the Juniper-Cross Mountain <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.