Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-, <br />J, <br /> <br />Pg. 138, C. 2, P. 2. The advent of stable flows has reduced the <br />risks and allowed recreation use of the river riparian corridors to <br />increase dramatically including such uses as hiking, camping and <br />rafting. The DEIS should provide a discussion of these reduced <br />risks. <br /> <br />; <br /> <br />Pg. 139, C. 1, P. 3. The DEIS should explain that blue-ribbon <br />fisheries have developed below dams in the Colorado River drainage <br />even with hydropower releases which raise and lower flows. <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />Pg. 139, C. 2, P. 3. Loss of individual trout may occur as a <br />result of stranding from hydropower releases during spawning when <br />some fish move into shallow areas and this may detract from the <br />angling experience for some people. Trout pOPulations in the <br />tail waters are probably not sufficiently affected by hydropower <br />releases to impact the numbers of fish available to sustain angler <br />enjoyment. The DEIS should explain these differences. <br /> <br />Pg. 140, C. 2, P. 3. Trout populations in a dam tailwater may be <br />affected by a maturing reservoir until it reaches an equilibrium. <br />This may occur possibly decades after creation, because released <br />water is likely to decrease in its potential to sustain high <br />productivity due to changing nutrient conditions in the reservoir <br />and its watershed. The DEIS should mention this expectation. <br /> <br />", <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />. <br />" <br />~: <br />!-. <br /> <br />Pg. 143, C. 1, P. 1. Under hydropower releases, commercial rafting <br />below Glen Canyon Dam has blossomed to a multi-million dollar <br />industry with over 50,000 users per year from less than 600 <br />immediately pre-dam. This industry is occasionally inconvenienced <br />by hydropower releases when rafts are left dry by an overnight drop <br />in stage, refloated by an increase or required to negotiate rapids <br />under differing conditions. The DEIS should explain the actual <br />problem and put it in some perspective relative to other issues. <br /> <br />" <br /><I <br /> <br />:'~ I <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br /><. <br />, <br /> <br />Pg. 143, C. 1, P. 3. Rafters camp on sand beaches created during <br />high, flood flow events and a change in beach availability would <br />require some parties to crowd onto remaining beaches. The DEIS <br />should explain why this is expected to be a problem. <br /> <br />>. <br />! <br /> <br />" <br />'.. <br /> <br />CHAPTER IV <br /> <br />~i, <br />.~ <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />Pg. 173, C. 2, P. 6. Sediment - Glen Canyon Dam effectively halted <br />sediment movement into the Grand Canyon from the Colorado River. <br />Water leaving the Dam is free of sediment and will remain so <br />regardless of changes in release patterns. A lack of sediment to <br />replenish beaches results in a gradual loss. Water Temoerature - <br />Glen Canyon Dam draws water from the deep, cold water levels of <br />Lake Powell. Temperature of water leaving the Dam averages about <br />500F and will remain so regardless of release patterns. Cold water <br />is needed to maintain the trout fishery but creates a significant <br />impact to chub and other native fishes. <br /> <br />. ~. <br /> <br />":: <br /> <br />29 <br />