My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06185
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06185
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:21:38 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:29:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.09B
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1994
Title
Comments re: Operation of Glen Canyon Dam Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />; <br />, <br />~I <br /> <br />based on a least-cost solution. This is an "apples and <br />oranges" comparison in which power impacts are significantly <br />understated. Economic values should be put on comparabl'e <br />terms in the DEIS. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />* A major deficiency in the DEIS is the failure to include <br />the anticipated cumulative economic and environmental impacts <br />from construction of replacement power capacity using <br />nonrenewable resources. Such an impact analysis is necessary <br />to a sound decision-making process. <br /> <br />Non-use value economics is being tested for possible inclusion in <br />the final EIS. Inclusion of non-use values without appropriate <br />review and comment is a major concern since "...including non-use <br />value potentially could alter the outcome of the economic <br />evaluation of the alternatives." (pg. 165) Considerable <br />uncertainty remains with regard to the validity and reliability of <br />techniques used to estimate non-use values, which affects the <br />credibility of the results. <br /> <br />* How is bias avoided in collecting value information? <br /> <br />" <br />.... <br />;..... <br />'. <br />..... <br />'> <br />" <br /> <br />I..l~ <br /> <br />* For which resources are non-use values being computed? <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />* What is the basis for excluding non-use values for power <br />users? <br /> <br />,.,. <br /> <br />* How does the non-use of power differ from other non-users <br />of the local resources? <br /> <br />::"1 <br /> <br />.~; <br /> <br />* What is the basis for the market (geographic) size for the <br />analysis? <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />....~ <br /> <br />* What resource impacts in the non-use value economic <br />evaluation are reversible and non-reversible? <br /> <br />~ <br />.j; <br />..... <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />* How are reversible impacts used so as to prevent skewing of <br />results? <br /> <br />~.;,. <br /> <br />~, <br />R <br />'j <br /> <br />* What non-reversible impacts are considered? <br /> <br />* What is being done to assess the non-use value of fossil <br />fuels which would be used for replacement power? <br /> <br />According to the contractor conducting the non-use study (HBRS): <br />"Sound environmental economic analysis must be based on a sound <br />scientific understanding of the underlying physical and biological <br />effects of dam operations." Since Adaptive Management has been <br />proposed in recognition of the need to continue learning and making <br />adjustments, today we remain uncertain as to the effects of dam <br />operation alternatives on the environment. Therefore, "neutral <br />depictions of the physical and biological impacts of the proposed <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.