My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06185
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06185
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:21:38 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:29:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.09B
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1994
Title
Comments re: Operation of Glen Canyon Dam Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />* Water level fluctuations of more than 30 feet during the <br />course of a year dictated vegetation distribution and density. <br /> <br />* Little canopy developed in the Old High Water Zone above <br />the scour zone. Forms consisted of desert stream forms like <br />the hackberry, mesquite, and acacia. <br /> <br />* Riparian species of wildlife were limi ted since the <br />riparian habitat was limited. <br /> <br />* Peregrine falcons and Bald eagles were likely rare due to <br />the lack of a reliable food supply. <br /> <br />* Wintering waterfowl concentrations did not occur prior to <br />dam construction. <br /> <br />,. <br />> <br /> <br />* Continuous muddy condition limiting light penetration to <br />the river maintained rather meager primary (algae) production. <br />This limited secondary production which affected both numbers <br />and kinds of fish and riparian wildlife. <br /> <br />~I <br /> <br />* Fish species were typical warm water species consisting of <br />mostly nonnative fish which had come to dominate the native <br />fauna by the time dam construction commenced. <br /> <br />* Prior to dam construction, nonnative catfish and carp <br />predators dominated the fish community, comprising about 80 <br />percent of all fish present. This change in dominance to <br />nonnatives developed despite the presence of temperature, flow <br />and sediment conditions which supposedly favors native fish. <br /> <br />, <br />~: <br />" <br />?: <br /> <br />, <br />'. <br /> <br />...:. <br /> <br />.' <br />, <br /> <br />* Trout populations and sport fishing for trout was non- <br />existent due to the warm, muddy conditions. <br /> <br />.< <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />* Recreation use of the river was limited due to instability <br />of flows and the likelihood for extreme changes in flow. <br /> <br />t" <br /> <br />Pre-dam conditions were characterized by a harsh environment of <br />extreme flow events, extremes in temperature and high turbidity. <br />These conditions were probably responsible for the low diversity of <br />wildlife and plants. Although the terrestrial habitat was <br />virtually pristine and, on the surface, the river seemed natural, <br />the fish life had changed dramatically and forever by colonization <br />by nonnative fish. The Bureau of Reclamation should ask those <br />entities most concerned about maintaining a natural system through <br />changes to facilities and operations if this means return to pre- <br />dam conditions described above. <br /> <br />.<, <br />i <br />!;, <br />.' <br />~ <br /> <br />" <br />':.~ <br />;- <br />..' <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.