<br />UUlon
<br />
<br />1984 Snowmelt Season
<br />as of May 1
<br />
<br />SPRING AND SUMt-lI::H IWNUfF VOLUMES WILL B~ AI:IUNDANT THIS YEAR UVEK A LAKGJ:: PUKTlUN UF
<br />!H.E l.,I!:STEfI.N V.S. !-ilGH F'U_l~S (!<!!TH. PI~IS5:!.:!!...:: ~L(}L\!:!.!'!(.;) !.!l!...!... UC!:!..'P. .".C.".P! !!-:!.S YE!l.P. 1"1
<br />THE FuLLUIHNG \.IATEKSHEDS: COLORADO, KIU GRANDE. ARKANSAS, NURTH ANlJ SUUTH PLATT!::,
<br />MUST UF THE GREAT IlASIN, AND TRIBUTARiES TO THE SNAKJ::: KIVEH. IN SOUTH~KN lLJAI1U AND
<br />EASTEKN OREGON. WATEK USERS IN NORTHERN MUNTANA AND CENIkAL ARIZUNA, ON THE OTHER
<br />HAND, WILL HAVE TO RELY ON STKLAMFLOW AUGMENTATION FHOM THEIl{ KESERvulR SYSTJ::MS.
<br />
<br />General Outlook
<br />
<br />Cool, wet ....eather in April caused increases In the
<br />streamf low forecasts over a large portion of the "estern
<br />U.S. Significant increases are expected in portions of
<br />eastern Oregon, southern Idaho, northeastern Nevada,
<br />Utah, Southern Wyoming, Colorado, and northern New
<br />Hexico. Major ilouding is expected in the Nurth and
<br />South Platte Basins, and the Humboldt Babin. Predicted
<br />streamflow volumes have increased it} to :LO p\:'rcent over
<br />April I forecasts in the Arkansas Hasin, 15 to 2U percent
<br />in the Great Basin, and ;15 to l.U percent in the Colorado
<br />Basin. Significant increases are 31so expected from
<br />southern Idaho tributaries into the Snake H.iv\:'r. Hasins
<br />in northern Idaho, northern Montana, and Ari1:ona are
<br />still expected to produce much below norrual flow
<br />volumes. Streams in the Columbia ~asin and along the
<br />Sierras are expected to yield near normal volumes.
<br />
<br />The old saying "the rich get richer and the poor get
<br />poorer" describes the precipitation patterns ill April.
<br />Areas of the West that were already saturated and had
<br />heavy accumulations of snow, received above norwal
<br />
<br />precipitation; and areas where seasonal precipitation had
<br />been below normal saw a continuation of that trend.
<br />ES6entially, the central portion of the West, stretching
<br />diagoni'llly from Oregon to northern New M(lxico, received
<br />above normal amounts of precipitation. The Sierras,
<br />central Arizona, and northeastern Montana received below
<br />normal precipitation. One notable exceptIon to the trend
<br />was above average precipitation in western Montana, which
<br />will help to increase the water supply from this area.
<br />
<br />The above average precipitation and cool temperatures
<br />in April have combined with an already above average
<br />snowpack to push sever3l snow courses to record snow
<br />water contentS tor May 1. MaxImum water content records
<br />were set on snow courses in Colorado, northern New
<br />Mexico, Utah, southern Idaho, northern Nevada, and
<br />southeastern Oregon. Un the other hond, below normal
<br />precipitation in the Sierra.!;, northern Montana, and the
<br />Yellowstone Park area has left snowpacks below to much
<br />below normal; and snow is almost nonexistant in the
<br />central Arizona watersheds.
<br />
<br />Reservoir storage throughout the ,,"est is excellent,
<br />and in some cases may be over abundant, with all states
<br />reporting generaily above normal levels for Hay I. Some
<br />western reservoirs have been drawn down in antici.pation
<br />of the above normal runoff volumes.
<br />
<br />Basin by Basin Summary
<br />
<br />SAN JOAQUIN, SACRAMENTO
<br />AND NORTH COASTAL BASINS
<br />
<br />As this water year began, nature seemed intent on
<br />exceeding the recoro high precipitation and streamflows
<br />of last year. Fortunately for many water users, but to
<br />the detriment of others, a major shift in storm patterns
<br />produced a very dry !;He winter and spring over most of
<br />CalifornLa.
<br />
<br />April precipitation followed the same pattern as each
<br />succeeding month since January. The monthly
<br />precipitation ranged from 80 percent of normal in the
<br />Upper Sacramento River drainage through the ~lukelurmle
<br />River drainage to 50 p\:'rcent of normal in the Kern kiver
<br />drainage. Only the extreme north coastal basins receiv~d
<br />above normal April p~ecipitation. 120 percent of average.
<br />
<br />The expected water year streamflow volumes continued
<br />to drop as a resuit of the drier than normal
<br />precipitation pattern, but are expected to be close to
<br />the normal range throughout California.
<br />
<br />COLUMBIA BASIN
<br />
<br />The water supply outlook for the ColumbIa River olld
<br />Pacific Coastal B.3sins calls for normal runoff volumes
<br />this season. In general, water supplies should be
<br />adequate for most tlsers in the area. Above normal
<br />precipitation during April boosted the forecast for tile
<br />Columbia Basin as a whole roughly 5 percent. The most
<br />significant increase came in the centrai section of the
<br />Snake River Basin, where forecasts nolo' indicate volumes
<br />will be well above normal. Very little change Is seen
<br />for the Canadian portion of the basin, which is forecast
<br />to produce slightly below normal \/olu;';l€s. Forecasts
<br />continue to indicate well below normal runoff volumes
<br />from the Clark Fork, Flathead, Pend Oreilie, and Kootenay
<br />
<br />Hasins. Basins in the Idaho panhandle and those draining
<br />the east slopes of the Washington Cascades are also
<br />expl:'cted to generate below normal volumes this season.
<br />Mony basins in central and southeastern Oregon are
<br />expected to yield two to three times their normal
<br />volumes.
<br />
<br />Mild and wet weather persisted across the Columbia
<br />Basin during April to provide 2U wet days west of the
<br />Cascades and 10 to 15 such days for eastside stations.
<br />Aprii temperatures averaged near normal except for
<br />depart.ures of -+2. degrees Fahrenheit for Princeton and
<br />Revelstoke, B.C. and -'1. degrees F03hrenheit for
<br />southeastern Washington, eastern Uregon and southern
<br />Idaho. Precipitation for the month of April was Ill.
<br />percent of average for the Columbia Basin above Grand
<br />Coulee, 1U5 percent of average for the ~nake above lee
<br />Harbor, and IU~ percent of average for the Columbia Hdsin
<br />above The ualles.
<br />
<br />As of May I, snow course measurements throughout the
<br />Nurthwest indicated a slightly below normal snowpack for
<br />the Columbia Basin as a yhole. The majority of Canadian
<br />stations reported a mountain sno~pack of near aV8rage to
<br />slightiy below average except for thl.! Similkameen and
<br />upper reaches of the Kootenay, which WLr~ much below
<br />aver<lge. The Snake River tributaries in central Idaho
<br />and Wyoming reported near normal snuwp.:lcks. ~lany Snake
<br />Kiver tributary basins in southern Idaho have accumulated
<br />record snowpacks this season. The upp~r reaches of the
<br />Deschutes, John Day, and Grande Ronde all reported above
<br />average snowpacks. The snowpack in the Cascades is
<br />generally near normal.
<br />
<br />Thl:' January-July forecast for the Columbia River at
<br />The Dalles, Oregon, calls for 107 million acre-feet or
<br />IOU percent of the 1961-I':ltlu average. At Grand COulee,
<br />Washington, the January-July Columbia River flow is
<br />forecast to be 57.7 million acre-f~et or 89 percent of
<br />normal. The total contribution from the Snake i:(iver
<br />Bas.in, as measured at Lower Granite Project, is forecast
<br />to be 38.1 million acre-feet or lib percent of normal for
<br />the J.:lnuary-September period.
<br />
|