My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06174
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06174
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:21:35 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:29:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.G
Description
UCRBRIP EA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/1/1987
Author
USDOI/USFWS
Title
Environmental Assessment on Recovery Implementatiohn Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> <br />2. Overall, the greatest potential adverse impacts arise from <br />nondiscretionary actions required under Section 7 of the Endangered <br />Species Act. These nondiscretionary actions are common to both <br />alternatives. Section 7 consultation will result in flow release <br />recommendations for Federal water projects that avoid jeopardy to <br />endangered fishes. The electrical generation, coldwater sport fish <br />and sportfishing, and recreational boating impacts which arise from <br />refinement of these dams' operations would be identical under both <br />alternatives. Moreover, since refinement of Federal dams' operations <br />account for all or most of the impacts in the above-mentioned areas, <br />there is ultimately no difference or very little difference between <br />the two alternatives' impacts on electrical generation, coldwater <br />sport fish and sportfishing, and recreational boating. <br /> <br />3. Activities contemplated under the two alternatives are often the same <br />or similar (see Table II-I-B), hence, impacts are correspondingly the <br />same or similar (see Table ES-l). If one compares the future with the <br />Recovery Implementation Program (Proposed Action) and the future <br />wHhout the Recovery Implementation Program ("No Action" alternative), <br />thi s "wi th/without" anal ysi s woul d show that the added benefits of the <br />Proposed Action are achieved with relatively small additional costs to <br />the human envi ronment. . <br /> <br />E. Consultation and Coordination with Others <br /> <br />The Recovery Implementation Program was developed by the mu)ti-interest <br />Upper Colorado River Basin Coordinating Committee, with the assistance of <br />water development and conservation organizations. The preliminary draft <br />was circulated to 59 organizations, .and the public review draft was <br />circulated to 109 organizations for review and comment. A Notice of. <br />Intent was published in the Federal .ReQister to scope out issues and <br />solicit public comment to assist.in preparation.of the environmental <br />assessment. The major issues surfaced during these review processes are <br />summarized in Chapter V. <br /> <br />ES-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.