My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06151
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06151
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:21:28 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:27:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8274.400
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - General Basinwide Salinity Issues - NPDES
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
9/1/1995
Author
Applied Hydrology
Title
Salinity Control Study - NPDES Permit No. CO - 0042161 - Prepared for Twentymile Coal Company
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />., <br /> <br />..... <br />1-- <br />W <br />I- <br /> <br /> <br />NPDE$ Permit No. CO-0042161 <br />Salinity Control Study <br /> <br />Twentymile Coal Company <br /> <br />In this qonceptual evaluation it is assumed that the treatment process and deep injection well <br />are loca,ted at a treatment facility located near the existing sedimentation pond. The RO <br />treatment unit would be caPable of treating flow up to 1 cfg, and the deep injection well would <br />be capatile of injecting a flow of 112 gpm. <br /> <br />It is impprtant to recognize that this does not result in total elimination of salt discharge.' The <br />RO trea$lent options cannot remove all salt from the process discharge, and the primary outlet <br />woulddjscharge flows without RO treatment when dewatering from the fish Creek Borehole <br />exceeded the treatment system capacity of 1 cfs and the available storage capacity of the pond. <br />In this cpnceptual design. the existing sedimentation pond would remain in place to facilitate <br />removal lof particulates. <br /> <br />3.3 Option 3: - Minimization or Salt Discharge Using Deep Well Injection <br /> <br />In this Conceptual option, the discharge up to 0.5 cfs from point 001 is injected in a deep <br />disposal' well. Occasional discharge from the sedimentation pond would' occur when <br />dewateri~g exceeded the injection well capacity of 0.5 cfs (224 gpm) arid the pond storage <br />capacity .' <br /> <br />It is asSUmed that the Dakota Sandstone would be used for deep well injection although it is <br />possible ~at isolated sand units, could be found at shallower depths within the Mancos shale <br />which might accept the anticipated quantity of discharge. The well is assumed to be 10ca,ted <br />near the ~ump station adjacent to the existing sedimentation pond. The existing sedimentation <br />pond wojlld remain in place to facilitate removal of particulates, and to Provide surge storage. <br />The deep injection well should be capable of injecting a flow of 224 gpm, twice the average <br />discharg~ measured during the 1990 - 94 record, If the injection well capacity was not as <br />much as :224 gpm, it would still likely be higher than the average dewatering flow, and, so <br />leave frei storage capacity in the surge pond. ' <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />.~! <br /> <br />;t <br />~{ <br />'~ <br />;J <br />.~ <br /> <br />J <br />, - -~ <br /> <br />AHA Fdeoamc: 14SAlCNl.DOC <br /> <br />Page 16 <br /> <br />2:52 PM 09/29/95 <br /> <br />,-J <br />:7 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.