Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />N <br />00 <br />00 <br />t;1) <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />PROPOSED REVISION <br /> <br />A revised PSIAC (1968) procedure would serve as a documentation <br />tool for quantification of present and future impacts of <br />conservation plans on rangeland. This revised procedure could also <br />be used, to document, quantify, characterize and predict <br />environmental impacts for rangeland planning in the preparation of <br />National Environmental Protection Act documents. <br /> <br />Modifications 1 through 7 relate to the over all character of the <br />PSIAC sediment yield procedure. Modifications 8 through 16 are <br />proposed updates to the actual rating of the individual PSIAC <br />sediment yield fiwtors (a through i). MOdification 17 is a <br />proposed revision of the PSIAC Sediment Yield Factor Rating Sheet. <br /> <br />Modification 1: It is proposed that the title of the PSIAC <br />procedure be restructured for consistent reference. The original <br />docUment has a title page that presents either a miSleading title <br />at' the top of the page Or at. best a cumbersome phrasing on ,the <br />whole title page that leaves the user with a reference, to a <br />committee rather than to a subject. It is proposed that the title <br />be changed to: PACIFIC SOUTHWEST INTER-AGENCY COMMITTEE SEDIMENT <br />,YIELD PROCEDURE - REVISED 1991. The acronym PSIAC would still be <br />valid for easy reference arid clear purposeful title with a date <br />would be available for formal reference.' , ' , <br /> <br />Modification 2: 'It is proposed that the PSIAC procedure' be <br />considered applicable for 'land units as small as 100, acres as <br />opposed to' the current lower applicability limit of 10 square <br />miles. Renard, (1980) favorably compared PSIAC results with <br />measured field data in 'watersheds, 100 acres or greater . SCs <br />experience in PSIACratings .oriwildfire impacted' watersheds that <br />drain 'into urbani:i:edareas along the wasatch, Front has found the <br />PSIAC procedure to be applicable to units of 100 acres or greater' <br />(Nelson and Rasely, 1989; Nelson and Rasely ,1990; Rasely and <br />Robison, 1987; Robison and Rasely, 1988). <br /> <br />, Modification 3: It is proposed that the PSIAC procedure does not <br />necessarily have to be applied to complete hydrologic units. The <br />PSIAC procedure may be applied to geomorphic units of 100 acres or <br />greater. The geomorphic units can be defined on any combination of <br />the following criteria: land use, climate; , precipitation, <br />elevation, geology, soils, erosion condition, hydrology or other <br />criteria that are used to determined that a landform is unique. <br />This modification should be used with discretion to avoid excessive <br />lumping or splitting of a watershed into too gross a division or <br />too many divisions. In other words, PSIAC can be used for land use <br />planning on major hydrOlogic units by dividing the hydrologic unit <br />into appropriate geomorphologies. <br /> <br />Modification 4: MOdification 3 presents the problem that a PSIAC <br />rating in a geomorphic unit will be a rating on a land form and not <br />