Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />.1 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />1804 <br /> <br />After further discusaion with the experts at HEC and due to the fact that the stream gages <br />had different period of records. we decided that further smoothing and interpolation of the data <br />was necessary to develop reasonable results. Therefore, the hydrologic analysis supported <br />completely by frequency-discharge relationships computed for the individual gages proved very <br />reasonable with the added peak flow values of 1921. It is recommended that the results <br />presented in Table 3.2 above be used as the peak frequencies of flows at these stream gage <br />locationB based on data through 1999. <br /> <br />3.2.2 Historic Sediment Information <br /> <br />Relatively long-term records of discharge-suspended sediment exist for the Arkansas <br />River at Las Animas gage station. The period of record for this Arkansas. River location is from <br />October 1942 to March 1972. <br /> <br />Logarithm (base 10) regression analysis was performed for the Arkansas River at Las Animas. <br />Figure 4 shows the scatter data and linear relation for the entire data set. The analysis cOnBisted <br />of entering the values into a spreadsheet program. performing unit conversions to arrive at water <br />discharge in cubic feet per second (cfs) and suspended sediment discharge in tons per day (lId). <br />elimination of zero discharges. sorting. and finally. correlation analyses of the logs of the water <br />versus the suspended sediment discharges. These analyses were recalculated using months rather <br />than days. Table 3-3 provides information on the success of the mathematical representations. <br /> <br />Table 3.3. Correlation (R2 values) of discharge versus sUBpended sediment. <br />Time Period Arkansas River at Las <br />Animas, CO <br />January 0.85 <br />February 0.86 <br />March 0.92 <br />April 0.75 <br />May 0.88 <br />June 0.90 <br />July 0.77 <br />August 0.81 <br />September 0.65 <br />October 0.90 <br />November 0.94 <br />December 0.95 <br />Aggregate 0.85 <br /> <br />The aggregate data and linear representations are relatively well behaved (smooth curves) <br />and consistent for the Arkansas River at Las AnimaB. The correlation coefficient for the <br />Arkansas River at Las Animas was 0.85. For the monthly analyses. the Arkansas River at Las <br />Animas shows reasonable curve fiIB, with correlation coefficientB of 0.65 to 0.95. <br /> <br />29 <br />