Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />oo~Z'j\) <br /> <br />S\.IDIIIID.I'7_ cia ta on unite <br />Average <br />&MUBl <br />increase iD <br />municipal <br />and indus- <br />trial <br />water <br />supplT <br />(acre-feet) <br /> <br />of Yampa-White project <br />Unit costs <br />Construction costs <br />Cost. <br />per acre <br />of full <br />service <br />land or <br />equi va- <br />lent 'JI <br /> <br />Project divisions <br />and units <br />Craig division <br />Wessels unit <br />Hayden Mesa unit <br />Great Northern unit <br />Juniper unit2/ <br />Two Bar unit~ <br />Meeker division <br />Yellow Jacket unit 36,900 4,240 41,140 117,920 (c) 53.840 18,710.000 490 103,500 1.1:1 I 1,500,000 <br />Flattops unit 0 0 0 0 221,300,000 128,000 32,000 62,300,000 410,200 1.5:1 35,785,000 <br />Total , ;b64,500 <br />!I These quantities were computed differently for the various units and are not comparable. YigureB marked a represent the volume of water at the eads of the main canals. <br />figures represent the volume of water at turnouts trom the main canale. The (e) figures represent the volume of water at two selected points in the Yellow JacKet unit. <br />31 The Two Har unit as presented in this report 1s dependent upon the construction of the potential CraBB Mountain powerplant and the potential Saverr-Pot Hook project. <br />J/ Figures shown represent unit construction cost per acre-toot of average annual stream diversion supplied, multiplied by the average number of acre~feet that would be furnished per <br />acre of Cull service land. <br />4/ Amount repayable by power and municipal water users includes interest during construction snd interest at 2.5 percent compounded annually over a -Tear repayment period. Approximatelr <br />182,3bO,0cx> would be paid by the power users and 153,425,000 by the municipal water users. <br /> <br />Irril:ation <br /> <br />Average <br />annual <br />saleable <br />hydroelectric <br />energy <br />(kllovatt- <br />hours) <br /> <br />Land to be <br /> <br />(acres) <br /> <br />Average <br />annual <br />imcrease in <br />irrigation <br />vater supp~ <br />(acre-feet)Y <br /> <br />Full <br /> <br />irriR.ated <br />Supple- <br />mental <br />service <br />land <br /> <br />Total <br /> <br />service <br />and <br /> <br />6,030 <br />22,640 <br />8,070 <br />101,280 <br />4,21iJ <br /> <br />6,750 <br />22,940 <br />10,61iJ <br />101,280 <br />4,21iJ <br /> <br />19,015 (a) <br />65,905 (a) <br />29,130 (a) <br />308,900 (b) <br />12,490 (b) <br /> <br />720 <br />300 <br />2.590 <br />o <br />o <br /> <br />Depletion <br />of upper <br />basin water <br />(acre-feet) <br /> <br />Total <br /> <br />7,370 <br />32,200 <br />13.520 <br />225.855 <br />10.010 <br /> <br />$2,488,000 <br />11,671,000 <br />4,467,000 <br />74,902,000 <br />1,445,000 <br /> <br />$390 <br />515 <br />495 <br />740 <br />340 <br /> <br />Annual <br />operation, <br />mainte- <br />nance, <br />and <br />replace- <br />ment <br />costs <br /> <br />$12,700 <br />63,800 <br />25,100 <br />276,400 <br />12,500 <br /> <br />Ben.fit- <br />cost <br />ratio <br /> <br />1.2:1 <br />1:1 <br />1:1 <br />1.4:1 <br />1.6:1 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />R~:rment of <br />I coste in <br />I <br /> <br />!Amount <br />pa;rable bT <br />water and <br />pbwer users <br /> <br />o <br />o <br />$70.500 <br />15,989,000 <br />320,000 <br /> <br />conatnlction <br />50 years <br />Percent or <br />total cast <br />pa;rable <br />by vater <br />and power <br />ussrs <br /> <br />o <br />o <br />2 <br />21 <br />22 <br /> <br />8 <br />100 <br /> <br />Amo~ <br />required <br />fraa <br />Upper <br />Colorado <br />River <br />lla.ain Fund <br /> <br />$2.488,000 <br />11,671,000 <br />4,396,500 <br />58,913,000 <br />l,125,QC() <br /> <br />17,210,000 <br />o <br />95,803,500 <br />The b <br />