My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06117
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:21:20 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:26:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8583
Description
Rio Grande Decision Support System
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
1/1/1988
Author
Steven J. Shupe & Jo
Title
The Upper Rio Grande: A Guide To Decision-Making
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />C011C2 <br /> <br />N then describes some of the pres- <br />sures on the current system to <br />adapt to changing circumstances, <br />The Indian role in water manage- <br />ment, the needs of traditional ace- <br />quia associations, the instream flow <br />concerns and the potential for water <br />marketing in the basin are the <br />issues examined in that section. In a <br />brief conclusion, we summarize <br />some of the challenges facing all <br />residents of the upper Rio Grande <br />region as they attempt to create <br />policies for the future. <br /> <br />The dynamic of decision-making <br />about the upper Rio Grande during <br />this century has followed a pattern <br />that is evident wherever choices <br />have to be made about a limited <br />resource. Early in the century initia- <br />tive was taken by irrigation interests <br />to build water projects that would <br />provide relatively secure supplies <br />and minimize flood and other prob- <br />lems, thus protecting investments <br />in agriculture, As urban areas grew <br />dramatically after World War II, <br />pressures mounted for further <br />flood control but also for new stor. <br />age specifically to meet urban <br />needs. State and federal efforts to <br />conclude interstate apportionments <br />on the Colorado and Rio Grande <br />systems also created opportunities <br />for federal funding of water pro- <br />jects. By and large, the interests of <br />economic growth in agriculture and <br />urba,n expansion were driving <br />forces behind water development, <br />Those groups, supported by capa- <br />ble congressional representatives, <br />created the legal and institutional <br />structure which now has the prin- <br />cipal responsibility for administra- <br />tion and management of the ' <br />region's water supply. <br /> <br />But as in most other river basins of <br />the West, new forces began to <br />acquire political influence over the <br />past twenty years as the population <br />and priorities of the region and the <br />Congress began to change. The <br />national themes of environmental <br />protection, Indian sovereignty, <br />minority rights, rural development <br />and a diminishing federal role in <br />the financing of local infrastructure <br /> <br />have all been reflected in controver- <br />sies in the upper Rio Grande region <br />about water, While the existing <br />institutions and the constituencies <br />that support them may feel threat- <br />ened by the emerging power of new <br />groups, they are simply witnessing <br />a process of political change that is <br />common in the allocation of <br />resources. As one constituency <br />after another defines its interests <br />and has a political impact through <br />publicity, lobbying, litigation or <br />other means, it tries to influence <br />existing institutions to change basic <br />policies. That integration of new <br />policies and criteria for decision- <br />making with the old can happen <br />gradually over a long period of time <br />or in a concentrated period of <br />struggle. <br /> <br />Environmental groups, concerned <br />about instream flows for species <br />protection or recreation, search in <br />vain through statutes written to <br />meet the needs of agricultural water <br />users for decision-making stan- <br />dards that will serve their interests, <br />They will push water administra- <br />tors to the limits of discretionary <br />authority under existing law but <br />then have to work to change the law <br />itself to incorporate new criteria. In <br />the Pacific Northwest, a process of <br />this type regarding the Columbia <br />basin culminated in the passage of <br />the 1980 Pacific Northwest Power <br />Planning Act. That act created new <br />management objectives for the sys- <br />tem as a whole. Henceforth, wild- <br />life protection was to have as high a <br />priority for the management agen- <br />cies as storage of water for irrigation <br />and hydroelectric power develop- <br />ment. Similarly, Indian tribes were <br />to have a new role in planning. But <br />that 'act was passed only after years <br />of conflict during which the Indian <br />and environmental groups shar- <br />pened their powers to be effective <br />in the political arena, At a national <br />level, similar changes have <br />occurred in relation to the licensing <br />of small-scale hydropower projects <br />by the Federal Energy Regulatory <br />Commission, After years during <br />which environmentalists fought the <br />decisions of the Commission as <br /> <br />favoring power development inter- <br />ests exclusively, they were able to <br />get a bill through Congress which <br />directed the Commission to give <br />equal consideration to environmen- <br />tal issues during the licensing <br />process. <br /> <br />Laws and institutions governing <br />river management decisions change <br />in response to the pressures of con- <br />stituencies as they become able to <br />work in the political process, Today, <br />in the Rio Grande region, Indian <br />tribes, in the midst of adjudication <br />of water rights, are preparing for <br />expanded roles in water management <br />and water quality protection. His- <br />panic residents'of rural communi- <br />ties are attempting to revitalize local <br />agriculture and the water institu- <br />tions that support a traditional way <br />of life. Environmental groups are <br />pressing federal and state water <br />agencies to pay attention to their <br />priorities while other governmental <br />units charged with protecting wild- <br />life and environmental quality are <br />attempting to tie their efforts into <br />those of the agencies dealing with <br />water supply. Out-of-state interests <br />are pushing to be able to market <br />water in the region or export it <br />across state lines, It is by no means <br />a foregone conclusion that recent <br />pressure will result in institutional <br />change. Indeed, some observers <br />believe it is too late to change an <br />institutional framework created by <br />international treaty and federal <br />law. <br /> <br />Water administration and manage~ <br />ment, once an obscure area of gov- <br />ernment, is getting more and more <br />publicity as the population as a <br />whole begins to understand its <br />importance for future decisions <br />about economic growth and <br />environmental protection, This <br />handbook is designed not as an <br />advocacy document but as a tool in <br />understanding the current system <br />of decision-making and the policy <br />issues posed by pressures for <br />change. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />-:"'. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />~ . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.