My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06091
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06091
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:21:13 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:25:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8141.700
Description
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project - Annual Operating Plans and Reports
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
5
Date
11/1/1974
Author
US DoI BoR
Title
Annual Operating Plan Fryingpan-Arkansas Project Colorado 1974 -1975
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />10~1. <br /> <br /> <br />All releases are coordinated so the releases from Turquoise Lake do not <br />exceed the safe channel capacity of ~OO c.f.s. in Lake Fork Creek. If . <br />more than 400 c.f.s. release is required, the excess water will be <br />, .f <br />released from the conservation pool of Pueblo Reservoir. Table 5 <br />and exhibit 9 show the proposed operation of Turquoise Lake in water <br />year 1975. <br /> <br />Pueblo Reservoir <br /> <br />Reservoir Inflow <br /> <br />Inflow to Pueblo Reservoir is broken into'two'sources: (1) natural <br />flow is considered the native flow of the Arkansas River at Pueblo Dam <br />plus upstream reservoir water being passed downstream and (2) project <br />water for storage in Pueblo Reservoir. <br /> <br />Upstream reservoir water including project water sold to the South- <br />eastern Colorado Water Conservancy District, is a small percent of <br />the total flow of the Arkansas River at Pueblo Dam and is considered <br />as part of the natural flow. <br /> <br />A probability curve for the natural inflow to Pueblo Reservoir was <br />computed by the modified California method and is shown graphically <br />on exhibit 3. <br /> <br />Annual inflow of a magnitude equaled or exceeded 50 percent of the <br />time was considered the most probable inflow, that with a 90 percent <br />chance of being equaled or exceeded was considered to be the reasonable <br />minimum, and that with only a 10 percent chance of beint>; equaled or <br />exceeded was considered the reasonable maximum. <br /> <br />The annual inflow was distributed monthly according to the averages <br />based on historical records for the years 1928-65. <br /> <br />Minimum Reservoir Release <br /> <br />The natural flow of the Arkansas River will be passed through the' <br />reservoir except for that water storable by decree. Before any natural <br />flow can be stored in Pueblo Reservoir, sufficient water must be in the <br />Arkansas River to assure filling of the conservation pool of John <br />Martin Reservoir and all senior rights between Pueblo Reservoir and <br />John Martin Reservoir must be satiSfied. Project water released from <br />Turquoise Lake to meet minimum flow in Lake Fork Creek will be stored <br />in Pueblo Reservoir. <br /> <br />Reservoir Operation <br /> <br />The 12,000 acre-feet of project water, minus transportation loss, <br />to be transferred to Pueblo Reservoir from Turquoise Lake will fill <br />the minimum pool with about 3,400 acre-feet in the conservation pool. <br />This water in the conservation pool will be used to meet the releases <br />in excess of ~oo c.t.s. from, Turquoise Lake if the need should arise. <br /> <br />Table 6 and exhibit 10 show the proposed operation of Pueblo Reservoir <br />in water year 1975. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.