My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06085
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06085
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:21:12 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:25:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8141
Description
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
5/22/1984
Author
National Wildlife Fe
Title
Shortchanging the Treasury--The Failure of the Department of the Interior to Comply with the Inspector Generals Audit Recommendations to Recover the Costs of Federal Water Projects--select chapters pr
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />0385 <br />Audit Findings <br /> <br />According to Inspector General June Gibbs Brown, cost <br />allocation concepts and procedures have not been applied <br />properly by BuRec on this project. BuRec incorrectly allocated <br />$69 million, exclusive of interest, to non-reimbursable rather <br />than reimbursable features of the project. Over the 50 year <br />repayment period this will accumulate to a $250 million <br />shortfall. This deficit will be borne by the general <br />taxpayers, thus allowing the project's power and water rates, <br />which are already low, to be even lower. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Shortfall as a kesult of the Inspector General's Findings <br /> <br />a) Initial Cost: $69 million <br />b) Accumulated deficit by the year 2024: $250 million <br /> <br />Audit Recommendations <br /> <br />The Inspector General specifically recommended that BuRec <br />revise cost allocations as follows: <br /> <br />1. keduce non-reimbursable Fish and Wildlife costs by <br />$49.4 million in order to correct the misallocation <br />from the 'use of the outdated Gross Sportsmen's <br />Expenditures method to calculate Fish and Wildlife <br />benefits. <br /> <br />2. Reclassify $8.3 million of certain construction costs <br />from the non-reimbursable Scenery Conservation category <br />to various reimbursable project functions. The purpose <br />of this construction was not solely for conserving <br />scenery, as required by the authorizing legislation for <br />classification as Scenery Conservation. <br /> <br />3. Reclassify a portion ($3.9 million) of the costs <br />assigned to the non-reimbursable Recreation and Scenery <br />Conservation category to Fish and Wildlife separable <br />costs, because the costs of certain features of Pueblo <br />Reservoir and Turquoise Lake which also serve Fish and <br />Wildlife functions were assigned wholly to Recreation <br />and Scenery. The amount classified as separable Fish <br />and Wildlife costs directly affects the amount of joint <br />costs to be allocated to Fish and Wildlife. The end <br />result is to decrease Fish and Wildlife joint costs by <br />$1.7 million with most of chis amount transferred to <br />the projecc's reimbursable functions. <br /> <br />60 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.