My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06042
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06042
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:21:01 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:24:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.300
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - General Information and Publications-Reports
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1974
Title
Colorado Water Conservation Board - 1974 Demonstration Farms for Salinity Reduction on the Colorado River
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />-2- <br /> <br />determined that the best approach is to start with a new ditch. The <br />~ concept of drilling the ditch, however, seems to have a lot of merit. <br />~ The difficulty envolved in forming the drops in the ditch and placing <br />;-' the outlets exactly level can be overcome by running a slightly larger <br />~~ ditch and drilling the outlets the next day while the concrete is'still <br />soft. Hater can be dammed up in the ditch to obtain the correct position <br />for drilling the holes. In this way, one can be assured that all the <br />outlets are level and they will distribute equal amounts of water to the <br />fields. <br /> <br />During the 1974 season the inflow-outflow record shows that 40 acre <br />feet of water ran off the fields that couldn't be used through the pump <br />back system. Next year we will have the capability to use this water. <br />On the improved 22 acre field the first irrigation took three and one half <br />days or eight hours per set. Subsequent irrigation took two and ,one half <br />days or 5.5 hours per set. The, total amount of water used was 2.3 acre <br />feet or'27.6 inches. The average per acre water use for winter wheat in <br />the area was 35.4 inches. Total yield on winter wheat was 65 bushels per <br />acre. <br /> <br />Mr. Thompson was pleased, with the performance of his pump back system <br />and will take every oportunity to use the runoff water from his pastures <br />to increase the nutrients going on his fields. One of the advantages of <br />this system is that fertilizer can be applied in the, irrigation' water <br />with increased, effectiveness and without loss from the end of the field. <br /> <br />Tests of the quality of water showed the tail water runoff to be <br />less than 5% more saline than the inflow water. This small increase <br />would not be deterimental to crops. ,On the contrary, the increased <br />nutrients and temperature of the ,runoff water has been found to be very <br />beneficial.;<' , <br /> <br />During the 1975 season the whole farm will be monitored for water <br />use. The pump back system will be used to prevent any tail water from <br />leaving the farm; Water use data will be collected and irrigation' <br />efficiencies will be recorded. <br /> <br />.~-, . <br /> <br />". .,~.- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.