My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06024
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:20:54 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:24:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8149.100
Description
Miscellaneous Small Projects and Project Studies - NRCS-Ft Lyon Canal Co Limestone Graveyard Creeks
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
2/1/1994
Author
Gronning Engineering
Title
Ft Lyon Canal Company Water Transfer Alternatives Study Final Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1824 <br />Ex~anges <br /> <br />Four different exchange operations are anticipated in operation of the FLWB, The first type of <br />exchange, called a Type 1 Exchange and illustrated in Figure 7.3, consists of an internal "contract" <br />exchange in Adobe Creek Reservoir, If the participating shareholder's portion of the FLCC's call <br />at the main headgate were less than the deferred diversion required to satisfy the water bank <br />requirements, then the difference between the two would be transferred from the water bank storage <br />account to the FLCC storage account in Adobe Creek Reservoir. Loss in the main canal would be <br />approximately equal to any loss in the storage canal through which the water bank water would be <br />delivered to Adobe Creek Reservoir thereby offsetting any loss assessment on the water. <br /> <br />The second type of exchange, called a Type 2 Exchange and shown in Figure 7.4, occurs if the <br />participating shareholders portion of the FLCC's call at the main headgate is greater than the <br />deferred diversion. The difference between the call and the deferred diversion, minus a 17% transit <br />loss assessment would be transferred from the FLCC storage account to the water bank in Adobe <br />Creek Reservoir. <br /> <br />A Type 3 Exchange consists of an internal contract exchange and is shown in Figure 7.5, When a <br />deferred diversion from the storage canal has been used to meet the requirements of the water bank, <br />the amount of deferred diversion would be transferred from the water bank account to the FLCC <br />storage account in Adobe Creek Reservoir, <br /> <br />A Type 4 Exchange, displayed in Figure 7.6, would move water from Adobe Creek Reservoir to <br />Pueblo Reservoir during the winter water diversion season. Water bank water would be exchanged <br />for water in storage in Pueblo Reservoir by diverting FLCC water destined for Adobe Creek <br />Reservoir into space in Pueblo Reservoir which would be under contract to the water bank, This <br />exchange would complete the cycle of water movement for the annual period and would prepare the <br />water bank accounts for the next water bank season. <br /> <br />In summary, Type 1 and 2 Exchanges are considered summer exchanges and are executed to <br />compensate for the variability of FLCC divertabIe flow vs. FLWB requirement in the river. Type <br />3 and 4 Exchanges are winter exchanges and take advantage of the more predictable flow in the <br />river, <br /> <br />Physical Constraints and Protection of Non-Participating Shareholders <br /> <br />Several physical characteristics of the river system and the FLCC system must be accounted for in <br />the operational analysis of the water bank, First, monitoring and operational adjustments at the <br />FLCC main headgate are major considerations. The FLCC superintendent estimates that the <br />diversion rate can be controlled within 3 cfs under current conditions (Smith, 1993), This level of <br />control is considered acceptable for measurement of deferred diversions. The headgate structure <br />is the major hydraulic control facility in the local reach of the river, Additionally, constraints must <br /> <br />7-19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.