Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />C;> <br />Iv <br />"'-l <br />C.,l\ <br /> <br />River water except by contract with the Secretary. Pursuant to <br /> <br />this authority, the Secretary entered. into water supply contracts <br />f/,." .cm/,~ ,-,,i/ ./ rr''1"tl/~.. P;.-!r,"c7'.. <br />vith the Palo Verde Irrigation District,.the Coachella Valley <br />-'1.. . <br /> <br />Irrigation District, the }letropolitan \Vater District of Southern <br /> <br />alifornia, and the City of San Diego. He also entered into a <br /> <br />contract with the State of Nevada to furnish water apportioned <br /> <br />to it by the Act. <br /> <br />The State of nrizona ratified the Colorado River Compact on <br /> <br />February 24, 1944 and in the same year entered into a contract with <br />the Secretary of the Interior for 2.8 million acre-feet of water <br /> <br />from the Colorado River. None of the water contracts included pro- <br />I ' . 't l't <br />Iv~s~ons cover~ng wa er qua ~ y. <br />i The Boulder Canyon Project Adjustment Act rel.ates to the <br /> <br />i # <br />'project power operations, including the determination of' rates and <br /> <br />disp~sition of revenues. <br />Water quality is not mentioned among the purposes of the <br /> <br />! <br />Boulder Canyon Project Act or in the legislative history. Again <br /> <br />the amounts of water set out in the Act are in terms of quantity <br /> <br />only. However, the high mineral content of the water reachin;T the <br /> <br />Imperial and C0achella Valleys has become more and more of a problem <br /> <br />in recent years. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MEXICAN WATER TREATY <br /> <br />. <br />. ;. <br /> <br />llexico began pressing for a permanent .and assured share of, <br /> <br />Colorado River water prior to the time of the Colorado River Compact, <br /> <br />and discussion of water for Mexico occupied a prominent part of <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />the negotiations for the Compact. The Compact recognized that an <br /> <br />allocation to Mexico might be required in the-future. <br /> <br />In 1925, <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />. ~ d <br />