Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />ES ENGINEERING-SCIENCE <br /> <br />identifies the estimated acres of jurisdictional wetlands that could be lost or <br />inundated by each water storage scenario. The federal regulatory implications of <br />adversely affecting or destroying jurisdictional wetlands are described in the fifth <br />section. Preliminary estimates of costs to prepare an environmental assessment <br />(EA) or an environmental impact statement (EIS) as well as costs to plan and <br />implement wetland mitigation measures are provided in the last section. <br /> <br />OBJECI'lVES <br /> <br />There are two primary task report objectives to be satisfied with the wetland <br />information and findings provided herein. First, the information helps determine <br />whether the storage concept is practically and economically feasible. Given that <br />jurisdictional wetlands are of high public interest and that their modification or loss <br />can potentially require extensive regulatory coordination and participation, this <br />resource becomes a key project screening and planning consideration. Second, <br />assuming that wetland resource constraints and considerations are considered <br />manageable, preliminary assessment findings become important in determining <br />which scenarios should be pursued further and what relative benefits and costs are <br />associated with each. <br /> <br />It should be noted at this point that the following estimates and findings are <br />based on reconnak~ance-Ievel estimates of jurisdictional wetland occurrence, <br />location, and boundary. This information is considered adequate to conduct <br />. preliminary screening analyses and to support feasibility-level comparison of <br />alternatives. More sophisticated planning decisions will require refinements of the <br />following wetland information. Information regarding effects to riparian areas is <br />aIsoprovided because more intensive technical review of these areas may justify <br />reclassifying some riparian areas as jurisdictional wetlands. <br /> <br />- The term "wetland" means those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface <br />or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under <br />normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for <br />life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, <br />and similar areas. Jurisdictional wetlands are wetlands which possess certain <br />physical characteristics that make them subject to regulatory consideration under <br />Section 404 of the Oean Water Act (CW A). Three criteria are used to identify and <br />delineate jurisdictional wetlands. They include hydric (saturated) soils, hydrophytic <br />. -. (water-loving) vegetation, and hydrology. H one or more of the essential physical <br />characteristics is missing, the wetland is considered to be outside the regulatory <br />authority of the CW A (i.e., it is a non-jurisdictional wetland). <br /> <br />The terms "riparian zone" or 'riparian area" define an area that is in or adjacent <br />to a drainageway and its floodplain that is characterized by plant species and/or life <br />forms different from those of the immediately surrounding upland zone. This <br />definition is a broader concept than wetlands and encompasses both jurisdictional <br />and non-jurisdictional wetlands; includes both woody and non-woody plants; and <br />involves either perennial or intermittent streams and shorelines of lakes and ponds. <br />The distinctive stands of trees and shrubs that occur along the banks of both Bear <br /> <br />.2- <br /> <br />816-3-3 <br />