Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />ES ENGINEERING-SCIENCE <br /> <br />include the whooping crane, bald eagle, interior least tern, and piping plover. <br />Potential impacts consider depletion of instream flows as well as effects on wet <br />meadows (a wetland type) and riparian woodlands associated with the river's <br />floodplain in the same area The FWS considers that depletions resulting from <br />higher reservoir evaporation rates and higher consumptive loss rates associated with <br />different water uses are factors that may jeopardize these species. <br /> <br />Streamflow depletion effects on T/E species in Nebraska became a substantial <br />issue during the FWS review of the proposed Fox Hollow at Lakewood Golf Course <br />and its water supply system. The issue was resolved by agreement among the Corps, <br />City and FWS. It is anticipated that this issue would reappear in FWS reviews of a <br />future EA or Section 404 individual permit application for additional water storage <br />not associated with the golf course water supply. The City, the Corps, and the FWS <br />recently reached agreement that acceptable mitigation for the golf course water <br />would consist of two commitments by the City. First, the City would lease 96 acre <br />feet of water each year from the Riverside Irrigation District and such water would <br />be released to the South Platte River near the Colorado/Nebraska state line each <br />year during the non-irrigation season for the life of the golf course. Second, the City <br />committed to making an annual contribution of $1,000 to the National Wildlife <br />Foundation to support research and habitat development activities associated with <br />the T /E species. <br /> <br />Project review comments can be offered under the FWS's authority to administer <br />provisions of the Endangered Species Act. Under Section 7 of that act, the FWS <br />may request formal consultation with the Corps (as the permitting agency) to <br />determine potential T/E species impacts and to identify mitigation measures that <br />would avoid jeopardizing the continued existence of these species. Project <br />sponsor(s) would be required to prepare or provide information to prepare a <br />biological assessment, which is considered by the FWS as part of their evaluation <br />process. <br /> <br />Agency Coordination <br /> <br />Corps decisions that potentially affect wetlands require coordination with EP A, <br />FWS, and CDOW at several points in the permitting process. The EPA has <br />discretionary approval authority for Section 404 permit decisions made by the <br />Corps. Both the Corps and EPA routinely seek advice from the FWS and CDOW <br />regarding Section 404 permit applications. FWS coordination for fish and wildlife <br />resource issues (which includes wetlands) is authorized by the Fish and Wildlife <br />Coordination Act, the Endangered Species Act, and several other statues. CDOW, <br />as the primary state agency responsible for managing Colorado's fish and wildlife <br />resources, is authorized under the same statues to review and comment on projects <br />that may affect these resources. <br /> <br />-16- <br /> <br />816-3-3 <br />