Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />ES ENGINEERING-SCIENCE <br /> <br />and surrounding areas. The map scale was 1:2400, and the contour interval was 2 <br />feet. The inundation level of Scenarios A. B, C, and D is 5,554, 5,574, 5,576, and <br />5,585 feet, respectively. Given that the existing permanent pool elevation is 5,558 <br />feet, the inundation area will increase with Scenarios B, C, and D and decrease with <br />Scenario A. <br /> <br />Preliminary locations and boundaries of jurisdictional wetlands and riparian <br />areas were also plotted on the same topographic maps. Inundated areas were <br />locations below the pool elevation contour. Inundated wetland and riparian areas <br />were measured using a polar planimeter. The planimetered area was converted to <br />acres using mathematical conversion factors and rounded to the nearest 0.1 acre. <br />Inundated areas were tabulated separately into five location categories (e.g., Bear <br />Creek wetlands and lakeshore wetlands) to demonstrate how different wetland <br />locations and types would be affected by each water storage scenario. <br /> <br />Wetland locations and boundaries were determined by comparing site conditions <br />in the field with aerial photography (approximately 1:4800 scale) and the <br />topographic maps. Approximately 90 percent of the maximum inundation area was <br />inspected in the field. Professional judgment was used in the field to estimate <br />jurisdictional wetland locations and probable boundaries. Efforts focused on <br />identifying jurisdictional wetlands because these sites would require permit action <br />by the Corps and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EP A) under Section 404 <br />of the Oean Water Act. Judgment was based on experience gained mapping <br />jurisdictional wetlands (using the 1989 federal wetland delineation method) <br />elsewhere in the park for the proposed Fox Hollow at Lakewood Golf Course. <br />Jurisdictional wetland determinations were based on vegetation species composition <br />and the hydric status of those species. Because of the extensive overlap of most <br />vegetation and hydrologic factors in both jurisdictional wetland and riparian areas, <br />the composition and hydric status of the dominant herbaceous ground cover was <br />most often the distinguishing characteristic that determined a site's status as either a <br />wetland or riparian area. Herbaceous ground covers dominated by facultative, <br />facultative wet, or obligative species were considered probable jurisdictional <br />wetlands, while ground covers composed primarily of upland and facultative species <br />were considered either upland or riparian areas. <br /> <br />The terms facultative, facultative wet, and obligative describe how strongly a <br />particular plant species is associated with wetland conditions. Each pIant species is <br />assigned to one of five major indicator categories that range from always being <br />associated with wetlands to always being associated with non-wetlands. Wetland <br />conditions include the three categories listed. Obligative species occur almost <br />always (estimated probability of encountering the species in a wetland is greater <br />than 99 percent) in wetlands under natural conditions. Facultative wet species <br />usually occur in wetlands (estimated probability ranges between 67 and 99 percent), <br />but occasionally are found in non-wetlands. Facultative species are equally likely to <br />occur in either wetlands or non-wetlands (estimated probability ranges between 34 <br />and 66 percent). Because detailed jurisdictional determinations were not included <br /> <br />-8- <br /> <br />Bl~~3 <br />