Laserfiche WebLink
<br />co! <br />.... <br />~ <br />... . <br /> <br />" <br />-, <br /> <br />SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER AUTHORITY - TREATMENT AND TRANSMISSION FAClUIT <br /> <br />reasonably anticipated actions should the Proposed Project not occur. Analysis of the No <br />Action Alternative provides a benchmark for comparing the effects of the alternatives <br />evaluated in this EIS. <br /> <br />Under the No Action Alternative, only the upgraded SNWS project would be used to pump, <br />treat, and deliver Colorado River water to the Valley, The upgraded SNWS (480 mgd) would <br />need to be operated at its maximum production rate of approximately 570 million gallons per <br />day (mgd). To operate the SNWS at its maximum production rate. the following activities <br />would need to occur: <br /> <br />. Additional In-Valley pipelines, pumping stations, and reservoirs would be needed to <br />convey the water into the Valley, since the current In-Valley distribution system cannot <br />accommodate more than 480 mgd, assuming completion of current improvements to <br />the SNWS facilities in the Valley, Approximately 230,000 feet of additional pipeline <br />would need to be constructed, compared to 361,000 feet under the Proposed Project. <br />An additional four pumping stations and four reservoirs would also be needed. These <br />facilities would enable the upgraded SNWS to deliver its maximum production rate of <br />570 mgd. <br /> <br />. The power supply infrastructure to the upgraded SNWS facilities would need to be <br />improved. This new infrastructure would include a smaller substation on the eastern <br />side of the River Mountains, new and upgraded 230 kV power lines, and new 69 kV <br />power line to the existing intake pumping station at Saddle Island as described for <br />Alternative 51-1 B. <br /> <br />. Additional power supply infrastructure would also be needed to operate the pumping <br />stations and reservoir on the western side of the River Mountains. This infrastructure <br />would include a new substation on the western side of the River Mountains and 69 kV <br />powerline to the Foothill site as described for Alternative SI-1 B. <br /> <br />These activities are considered reasonable and foreseeable future responses under the No <br />Action Alternative. Improvements to the power supply infrastructure to the upgraded SNWS <br />were previously described as a related project under the EA for the SNWS Improvements <br />(Reclamation, 1994d: 14-1), but at that time were anticipated to be completed by Nevada <br />Power Company. Federal Actions related to these activities would be the same as for the <br />Proposed Project. <br /> <br />Major assumptions related to the evaluation of the No Action alternative include water <br />conservation measures in the Valley, the construction and operation of wastewater <br />reclamation/reuse facilities, groundwater recharge, and use of the Valley's shallow aquifer. <br /> <br />PHASING OF THE SNWA-TTF PROJECT <br /> <br />The ultimate design capacity of the proposed SNWA-TTF facilities is approximately 600 mgd, <br />under normal operating conditions; however, facilities would be constructed in phases to <br />match water demands and satisfy reliability needs, Design capacity of the various components <br />of the SNWA-TTF Out-Valley system for projected demands through the year 2025 (facilities <br />analyzed in this document) and at ultimate buildout are shown in Table S-2. Additional <br /> <br />5-10 <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br />