My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05932
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05932
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:20:33 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:22:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.100.50
Description
CRSP - Power Marketing
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
8/1/1985
Author
USDOE/WAPA
Title
Report to the Congress on Colorado River Storage Project Power Resources and the Financial Support of Authorized Projects in the Upper Colorado River Basin States
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Other SourceS of Revenue <br /> <br />Possible revenue sources other than CRSP power sales were also identified. <br />These are: increase the price of water; increase the price of project use <br />power; ad valorem taxes; fees on nonreimbursables; a State water resource <br />development fund; a regional reclamation fund; taxes on mineral extraction; <br />Federal and State land fees and additional new power facilities. Ad valorem <br />taxes and taxes on mineral extraction appear to have the most promise from <br />among these other revenue sources. <br /> <br />Nontraditional Sources of Capital <br /> <br />Nontraditional methods of obtaining capital for constructing authorized <br />projects were also researched. The most promising appear to be bond financing <br />by non-Federal entities (including beneficiary financing), State financing, <br />and extending the Upper Colorado River Basin revolving fund to include <br />disbursements for construction. Less promising alternatives identified were <br />private financing, trust funds, an Authorized Projects Bank, and selling stock <br />in the Federal Power System. The studies showed that some financing <br />mechanisms, such as a construction revolving fund or low interest-bearing <br />State funding, would require a substantially smaller increase in rates to <br />achieve project repayment within the authorized period, than would other <br />financing mechanisms. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.