My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05931
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05931
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:20:33 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:22:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.766
Description
Gunnison River General Publications-Correspondence-Reports
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
4/21/1994
Author
Unknown
Title
Gunnison Basin Planning Model Inflow Review - Discussions - Recommendations - Unresolved Issues
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, ft',,<;."'S <br />_" J',j .--.... ' <br /> <br />Draft: April 21, 1994 <br /> <br />INFL16: Blue Mesa Tributary Inflows <br />(steuben, Elk, Coal, Beaver, and Willow Cks.) <br /> <br />INFL23A, B, C, D (See discussion under <br />"Unresolved Issues" ): Horsefly, Happy <br />Canyon, Spring Creek, and Dry Creek inflows <br />(Uncompahgre Basin) <br /> <br />-Note: Although INFL4l (Razor Ck. above Razor <br />Ck. Reservoir) falls into this category of <br />inflows, it was felt that potential element <br />capabilities be retained for this site: the <br />user is made aware of inflow application <br />limitations; if a user has a particular <br />interest in modeling the reservoir, a set of <br />user defined inflows for the site can be <br />input; <br /> <br />other Corrections: <br /> <br />In the course of inflow review, several errors in <br />model network and inflow representation were identified: <br /> <br />Blue Mesa/Tomichi portion of the model network <br />shows inflow "RemainingTribGainstoBlueMesaRes" <br />(which corresponds to INFL17 -- Reclamation i.d.); <br />previous discussions have proposed that Antelope <br />Ck. inflows be explicitly represented in the model; <br />this required disaggregation of INFL17 into INFL17A <br />and INFL17B, where: <br />- INFL17A = Antelope Ck. flows <br />INFL17B = remainder of original INFL17 <br />inflows <br />Network and inflow representation needs to be <br />modified to facilitate this change <br /> <br />Note: considerations as discussed for INFL4l <br />and INFL16 above may also be applicable to <br />INFL17A and INFL17B, respectively (INFL17A and <br />INFL17B are both derived from a difference <br />file) ; <br /> <br />15 <br />~ <br /> <br />Ouestion: Is dropping explicit representation <br />of Antelope Ck. an option ? <br /> <br />Network representation of the Electric Mountain <br />Reservoir site as shown on the North Fork/Smith <br />Fork portion of the network diagram is incorrect; a <br />copy of the fax sent to Hydrosphere including a <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.