My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05904
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05904
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:20:25 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:21:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8111.600
Description
ARCA Annual Reports
Basin
Arkansas
Date
6/1/1985
Author
ARCA
Title
Thirty-Sixth Annual Report Arkansas River Compact Administration for the Year 1984
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1____ <br />, <br />, <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br />! <br />1'_ <br />I~. <br />.-'. <br /> <br />IE- <br /> <br />1- <br /> <br />,I <br />l <br /> <br />~ <br />, <br /> <br />ATTACHMENT B <br /> <br />SECRETARY'S REPORT DEC. 13, 1983 <br /> <br />The 1983 irrigation season, water wise, was one of the best] have <br />experienced since I started farming. <br />We had an above average snowpack and a very wet spring. This made <br />a very good runoff into John Martin Reservoir. Our summer was very dry <br />with many days above one hundred dcgrees, making the need for <br />irrigation water for our farmland extremely high. <br />We have experienced very good relations with the U.s.G.S. personnel <br />in their cooperation to keep the water measuring stations in working <br />condition. One improvement I would suggest would be one stream <br />measurement at the state line three days after water is turned out of John <br />Martin Reservoir for Kansas and another a week later to' help in <br />regulating the water delivery to them. The river seems to change <br />considerably when the water in it rises abruptly making for much. <br />guessing on the part of Colorado water commissioners in their effort to <br />deliver Kansas' share of water. <br />I believe that rather than living on some of the surplus funds we have <br />on hand it would be better to use them [or further improvement of our <br />gauging stations, such as telephones on the various creeks during the <br />summer time only, when it would be most advantageous. We could pay <br />for observers that live close to the creeks and have telephones for first <br />hand reports of conditions after rain storms. To make their observations <br />_,.more ac~urate we could have staff gauges on bridges located close to <br />their homes for accurate observations. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />/s/ Leo Idler <br /> <br />ATTACHMENTC <br /> <br />TREASURER'S REPORT <br />July 1. 1982 Ibru June 30,1983 <br /> <br />CASH BALANCE; JULY I, 1982 <br /> <br />............ ... .$37,799 <br /> <br />RECEtPTS: <br />Revenue from Assessments: <br />Colorado-60% ......... .............. ...... .................. $11.608 <br />Kansas-40%...... ..................... 7.736 <br />Interest.... ................ .................... 2,803 <br /> <br />TOTAL RECEIPTS. <br />DISBURSEMENTS: <br />Insurance <br />Geological Survey. <br />Equipment ...... <br />Profe~ional Fees <br />Office Supplies..... <br /> <br />22,147 <br /> <br />100 <br />10,845 <br />2,483 <br />250 <br />550 <br /> <br />43 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.