Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />00168':l <br /> <br />TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) <br /> <br />SECTIONS <br /> <br />PAGE NUMBER <br /> <br />THE SAN LUIS VALLEY PROJECT DATA-BASE <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br />Reclamation's Data-Base <br />Enhancement of Reclamation's Data-Base <br />Enhancement of the Geological Data For Project Salvage Wells <br />Query Capabilities <br /> <br />29 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br /> <br />COMMON FACTORS FOR WELLS WITH PRODUCTION PROBLEMS 34 <br /> <br />Identification of Suspect Wells 34 <br />Well Location as a Factor 34 <br />Well Ground-Elevation as a Factor 35 <br />Well Design That May Be Characteristic of Problem Wells 38 <br />Water Quality As A Factor In Yield Reduction 43 <br /> <br />STUDY CONCLUSIONS 46 <br /> <br />What is the Prime Cause of Reduced Project Well Production? 46 <br />What Conditions Have Lead To These Aerobic Growths In Project Wells? 47 <br />Will Chemical Cleaning and Treatment oflnfected Wells Restore Capacity? 48 <br />Are Other Project Wells Likely To Be Subject To Bacterial Growths? 49 <br /> <br />SUMMARY OF mE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO RECLAMATION 50 <br /> <br />The Nature ofthe problem and Its Root-Source 50 <br />Location of Problem Wells 51 <br />Nature of Alternative Designs 52 <br />Needed Additional Information 52 <br />