My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05903
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05903
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:20:25 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:21:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8583
Description
Rio Grande Decision Support System
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
2/1/1998
Author
Dr. John W. Hernande
Title
Evaluation Of Salvage Well Production Problems In The Closed Basin Of The San Luis Valley Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />COllibO <br /> <br />what is believed to be a good water quality site, another is what is identified as a potentially poor <br />water quality site (meaning it provides iron and slime bacteria with growth enhancing nutrients), <br />This will allow study of the existing well degradation process, Another similarly paired set of <br />wells built with the original design should be used to test new operating standards (avoiding <br />cascading, Le" never allowing the cone of depression to expose the top of the well screen), A <br />third pair of wells should be built with new design criteria and operated with the new operating <br />criteria, A fourth set of wells built with the new design and operated with old procedures can be <br />expected to degrade and may not be essential to these investigations, Salvage and reuse of as <br />many of the existing well components and controls as possible would be part ofthis replacement. <br /> <br />Well Design and Operating Better Site Poor Site <br />Procedures (Low TOC, N & P, (High TOC, N & P, <br /> higher elevation) , lower elevation) <br />Old Design & Old Operating # I #2 <br />Procedures' <br />Old Design & New Operating #3 #4 <br />Procedures <br />New Design & New #5 #6 <br />Operating Procedures" <br />New Design & Old Operating #7 #8 <br />Procedures <br /> <br />'Old Design & Old Operating Procedures: Current Design &Operating Procedures <br />"New Design and Operating Procedures would consist of shorter well screens and/or shorter <br />pumping cycles to prevent cascading, Le" to avoid the cone of depression exposing the top of <br />the well screen, <br />These three paired sets of wells would allow the testing of two hypotheses: <br />1. Wells were placed where parameters encourage biofouling by slime and iron bacteria, <br />II, Design and/or operation procedure problems lead to cascading water (the well screens are <br />too long or the pumping cycle is too long, such that the cone of depression exposes the <br />top of the well screen) which introduces quantities of oxygen into the aquifer, stimulating <br />bacterial growth, <br /> <br />The total number of wells needing to be replaced will be based on the relative success of early <br />rehabilitation treatment experiments and further detailed review of existing well performance, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.