|
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />0016S3
<br />
<br />chemical and bacteriological analysis on water samples, In other cases, one firm performed
<br />
<br />treatment and rehabilitation processes, and at the same time water samples were sent to another
<br />
<br />firm for bacteriological analysis, The eight service and/or consulting firms from which reports
<br />
<br />are available, and the dates and titles of their reports, are as follows:
<br />
<br />1. SL V Analytical Services, Inc" of Alamosa, Colorado, memo report ofJune 30, 1994;
<br />
<br />2, CDS Laboratories of Durango, Colorado, laboratory reports dated September 13,
<br />1995 and letter of September 25, 1995;
<br />
<br />3, Water Systems Engineering, Inc" of Ottawa, Kansas, letter reports of December 7,
<br />1994, October 27, 1995, and January 19, 1996;
<br />
<br />4, AGRO Engineering, Inc, of Alamosa, Colorado, Assessment and Rehabilitation of
<br />SW-78. SW-81. SW-122. and SW-168, of December 20,1996;
<br />
<br />5, Sangre de Cristo Laboratories, Inc" of Alamosa, Colorado, laboratory reports of May
<br />20, 1997, June 27, 1997, July 1, 1997, August 6, 1997, and August 28, 1997;
<br />
<br />6, Mitchell Drilling Co" report of chemical treatment of a salvage well dated April
<br />29,1997;
<br />
<br />7, Wheelabrator-Johnson Screens, of Saint Paul, Minnesota, report of a number of
<br />salvage wells dated December 5, 1994 and January 3, 1995; and
<br />
<br />8, Continental Technologies, Inc, of Little River, Kansas, field reports and rehabilitation
<br />proposals dated June 20, 1997, July 1, 1997, August 12, 1997, and August 14, 1997
<br />on chemical well cleaning operations on a number of wells ,
<br />
<br />SLY Analytical Services, Inc.
<br />
<br />This is a 1994, one-page report, of chemical and bacteriological samples collected from
<br />
<br />two wells: SW-66 and SW-95, The SL V bacteriological analyses were based on microscopic
<br />
<br />examinations of3 sludge-samples collected by Reclamation in SW-66 at two different levels:
<br />
<br />two samples from near the water level in the well, and one sample from more than 40 feet below
<br />
<br />the wellhead, The collection point for the single sludge-sample from SW-95 was not identified,
<br />
<br />The iron content in the sludge samples is reported to be very high: on the order of 100 mg per
<br />
<br />14
<br />
|