|
<br />B~ton, ~;;"~~from Pa,. 7 J J 3137
<br />
<br />41 S~I! the United States' claims Cor instream flow water rights for Dinosaur
<br />National Monument in Case No. W-85, District Court, Wau:r Division
<br />No, 6, SUIte of Colorado, with these claims being denied by Orders dated
<br />March 14, 1985 and JllIIe 4. 1985.
<br />51622 F. SuP!>. 842 (D. Colo. 1985).
<br />6/16 U.S.C. See. 1131," seq. (1986).
<br />71 Act oC July 26, 1866, 43 U.S.C. Sec. 661 (1986); Act oC July 9. 1870,
<br />43 U.S,C. See. 661 (1986); ACI of March 3, 1877, 43 U.S.C. Sec. 321
<br />(1986).
<br />8/2(J7 U.S. 564 (1908).
<br />9/1d. at 575.
<br />10/349 U.S. 435 (1955),
<br />Il/ld. at 456-57.
<br />121 S. 863 841h Cong" IsI Session (1955); S, 863 851h Cong" 1st
<br />Session (1957); HR 2363 861h Congo 1st SessIon (1959); Cor a tabulation
<br />of the legislative proposals that have addressed the federal reserved rights
<br />issues. s.. Complroller Genera1 or The United Stales, Report To The
<br />Congress--Reserved W_ Rights For Federal And Indian Reservations; A
<br />Growing Conlroversy In Need Of Resolution (1978).
<br />13/373 U.S, 546 (1963).
<br />14/1d. al 601.
<br />15/426 U.S. 128 (1976).
<br />16/ld. at 141.
<br />17/438 U.S, 696 (1978).
<br />18/ld. at 708.
<br />19/1d. at 700.
<br />20/622 F. Supp. 842 (D. Colo, 1985).
<br />21/ Se. Ihe Book of Ecclesiastes in Ihe Old Testamen~ chapter wee_
<br />221 See Complroller General Report, supra note 12_
<br />23/ Holmes, Collected Legal Papers. p, '1JJ7 (New York. 1920).
<br />
<br />
<br />'}AI Ranes v. Office Employees International Union, 317 F,2d 915 (1963) '~:
<br />251 S. 1275, 88111 Cong., 1st 5oss. (1963). . : "I.
<br />26/ United Stales v. Natfalin, 441 U.S. 768, 773 (1979).
<br />27/16 U.S,C. Sec. 1271, ., seq. (1986).
<br />28/16 U.S.C. 1284(c) (1986).
<br />29/114 Cong. Reo., 26592. 28313 (Se~ber 12, 26, 1968)
<br />301 S.., ..g.. H.R. 4233, S. 2097, 99111 Cong" 2d Session (1986).
<br />311 Col. Rev. Stat. 37-92-102(3) (Supp, 1986),
<br />· This ar'ic l.e represen1.3 1M. View3 of 1M author and Ls not intended as the
<br />viewpoinl of the firm Moses, Wiuemyer, Harrison and Woodruff or diems
<br />the fvm represenJs.
<br />
<br />ELS Dialogue is an occasional publication of the University of
<br />Colorado School of Law, Environmental Law Society. Douglas A.
<br />Goulding coordinated the publication of this issue, with the subSlAntial
<br />help and cooperation of two sets of ELS orficen: Raben G. Cole, Ellen
<br />Robens, Steve Bretsen, Wendy Feuer, Susan Schoeme, Steve Jelfen. and
<br />Randy Canney. Many ELS memben are acknowledged for their time in
<br />raising funds to help wi.th printing and publication casu. ELS is
<br />especially gl'3leful to the Univenity of Colorado NalUral Resources Law
<br />Cenler and its dirc:a:or. Lany MacDoMell, for advice and Juppon in
<br />publishing the ELS Dialogue. ELS thanks me Rocky Mountain Mincn.1
<br />Law Foundatioo. the CU Law School SludQll Bar Association, and lhe
<br />Carlson, HMJUnood, and Paddock law rum, of Denver, Colorado, for their
<br />support. ELS alcnds special thank. to Lori Potter .IJld Timothy 1.
<br />Bc..awn for conuibullng the articles published in this issue. Please direct
<br />canrnenu or requesu for additional copies to: Environmental law
<br />Society, Campus Box 401. Univcnity of Colorado School of Law
<br />Ilou1der. iliondo 80309-0401. .
<br />
<br />-
<br />
|