My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05862
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05862
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:20:14 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:19:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10
Description
Colorado River-Water Projects-Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powel-Glen Canyon Adaptive Management
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/2005
Author
DOI-USGS
Title
Sedimentology and Stratigraphy of the Palisades Lower Comanche and Arroyo Grande Areas of the Colorado River Corridor Grand Canyon Arizona
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />02064 . <br /> <br />Appendix 2: Stratigraphic Sections and Geomorphology, Lower Comanche Area <br /> <br />45 <br /> <br />pinches out laterally into gravelly alluvium. This surface <br />locally has 20-30 em of topographic variation in this <br />exposure. The lo\\<'er boundary appears to be confonnabJe. <br />and there is no evidence of erosional activity (lnmcation <br />oflaminae). The upper surface is. however. eroded. which <br />probably accounts for the absence of the upper 1\'..'0 phases <br />of this white-layer unit. Irs thickness varies between 0.5 and <br />1.5 em locally. <br />79 - 83 em (Unit E): This is one of several westward <br />(riven\t"ard)-migraling channels representing paleoarroyo <br />feafllres in this locality. Thinly bedded silt laminae are <br />present. primarily horizontal. though inclined at the edge of <br />the channel. Silly nne sand occurs where this stratigraphic <br />section was measured, hut this interbeds laterally with <br />channel gravels locally d~rived from the Dox Fonnation. <br />Th~ lower contact of unit E is abl1lpt. representing one stage <br />in channel filling, but does not appear to be significantly <br />erosive. This unit, \\ihich occurs as a horizon as much as 50 <br />crn thick in a nearby channel-till exposure. is the edge of <br />channel-fill deposits. <br />83 - 87 em (Unit F): The facies within unil F strongly <br />resembles unit E above (channel-fill material). with the <br />exception thar cross-stratification is ob.sen'ed in the channeJ- <br />fill deposits. This stratum also grades locally into channel <br />deposits derived from the Dox Fonllation and locally <br />reaches 50 em in thickness. One sample was collected from <br />unit F for grain-size analysis: Com Strat 2. Unit F (samplc <br />depth not recorded). <br />87 - 132 em (Unil C): The texture of unit G is primarily fine <br />sand but with occasional small pebble-gravel lenses. The <br />lowermost deposits ofrhis stratum (\....hich arc generally <br />not observed) are gravel. Sediments at the top and bottom <br />of unit G appear to be slightly cemented and are redder <br />in color than the lower deposits of this unit. This horizon <br />represents channel fill and in places is signific~H1tly thinner <br />than at the recorded section location. <br />132 - 135+ em (Unit H. 10 base of section): This 10\Vennost <br />stratum contains vcry fine sandy channel-margin deposits. <br />These are thinly bedded, with laminae in some places and <br />indistinct bedding in others. These sediments are interpreted <br />as tributary alluvium and appear to have been modified <br />by wetting and drying related to ground water, producing <br />contorted liesegang-like oxidation bands in some areas. This <br />IVould imply a relati,ely high water lable, which is difficull <br />to explain in this particular location. <br /> <br />Section 2 sllmmary.- This profile represents various facies <br />of tributary alluvium deposited in and adjacent to a series <br />of eastward (shoreward)-migrating channels, which may <br />interbed with sediment originally derived from fluvial <br />and/or aeolian deposit~. The white-layer horizon \....as <br />deposited at a time when the deepest channels had largely <br />filled but a gravel-bottomed channel still persisted adjacent <br />to the bedrock valley wall. Additional tributary alluvium <br />was deposited above the white layer, although associated <br />channels are not as apparent or as deep as those from earlier <br /> <br />times (at least until the modem arroyo-cutting episode). <br />Sediments contained within this alluvial stack are unusually <br />fine. and. \'v'ith the exc.:cption of gravel-bottomed channels, <br />contain very limited amounts ofbedrock-d~rived sediment. <br />The source of alluvial sediments is believed to be reworked <br />aeolian deposits from upstream and valley-slope areas. <br />The relationship of these sediments to modem coppice <br />accumulations is not clear. <br /> <br />Lower Comanche, Section 3 <br /> <br />The pit from which section 3 was described is shown in figure <br />42. Figure 43 shows the stratigraphic profile for section 3. <br />Measurements are in ern below the grollnd surface. <br /> <br />Surraee: This profile is a pit dug into a ftal land surface wilh <br />sparse vegetation. The surface shows evidence of recently <br />ponded water (abundant mudcracks) over:J large area, <br />and crust formation 2-2.5 mm thick. Minor mud curls are <br />pres~nt; cryptogamic development is present but weak, and <br />short grasses (chem grass) have colonized the area. <br />0-5 em (Unit A): lIpperolOS! sediment in this section <br />contains soft. very friable (to single grains) coarse, weakly <br />subangular, blocky nne sandy silt. Sand content is estimated <br />to be approximately 25-30 percent. with the remainder silt. <br />Considerable bioturbation, primarily by rootlet growth. <br />has obscured most sedimentary structures. Minor cross- <br />lamination is visible, but this unit is generally massive. The <br />lower contact is clear to sharp, and wavy. An aeolian origin <br />is infen'ed; the llnit ::lppears to be a loose aeoli.an cover on <br />the surt:1ce. <br />5 - 20 em (Unit B): Unit B is a silty fine sand that contains <br />subhorizontal. paper-thin laminae throughout that may be <br />related to wetting episodes. Sand content is estimated to be <br />-75 percent. with the remainder silt. Sediment is friable, <br />and is slightly lllore consolidated than unit A. No cross- <br />bedding is visible. The lower contact is somewhat arbitrary, <br />and has been placed af 20 em. in il zone where silt lamill::le <br />become more prominent and frequent. These laminae may <br />be remnants of a wetted surface, weathering out to appear <br />more consolidated than the sediment above or below. Unit <br />B is interpreted as a likely aeolian deposit on the basis <br />of its texture and lamination. This may represent aeolian <br />deposition with periodic wetting. <br />20 - 40 em (Unit C): Lamination in unit C shows some <br />disturbancc attributed fo biowrbation in the upper 3 em <br />of this horizon. There is a broad channel in unit C with a <br />maximum depth of 8 cm that has lamination in the channel- <br />fill sediment (cross-lamination is not present). Scattered <br />pebbles and granules occur in the channel-nil material, <br />which may represent a deflation or lag deposit. Silt laminae <br />are present at the base of the channel fill, but they become <br />indistinct toward its edges. Sediment in the channel is <br />dominantly soft, fine sand and silt with occasional pebbles <br />and granules. Bedding both inside and oulside the channel <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.